Shahjalal University of Science and Technology - SUST vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs Metropolitan University Sylhet vs Sylhet Medical University vs Leading University - LUS
Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and quality of education
- +Vibrant student life and extracurricular opportunities
- +Positive career outcomes and professional development
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Outstanding quality of classes and lectures
- +Helpful courses for long-term goals
- +Supportive teachers and focus-conducive facilities
Nothing to show
- +Supportive staff and excellent instruction
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse clubs
- +Quality academic programs and facilities
Nothing to show
- +Career-focused business programs
- +English language skill development
- +Practical and international skill building
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of expert professors and insufficient modern courses.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities, such as classrooms and labs.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often seen as insufficient or irrelevant.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Disorganized administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Inconsistent or uninspired curriculum and teaching methods lead to disengagement.
This institution garners excellent marks across several aspects. Notably, the location and student life received the highest scores, indicating a vibrant and desirable environment. Professors are also highly rated. However, accommodation and internationality represent the areas with the lowest ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these specific facets of the university experience. Overall value is rated positively.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution achieves excellent scores in several key areas, notably in student life, location, and professor quality, all rated 4.75. Internationality and value also received strong marks. The weakest area for the university is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Facilities are rated a solid 4.
Nothing to show
This institution garners praise for its excellent Professors and desirable Location, both receiving a high 4.8 rating. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded, scoring 4.6. While Internationality is rated a respectable 4.2, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a score of 3.8. Overall, the university offers strong value, reflected in its 4.6 rating.
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent marks for its **internationality (5)**, indicating a diverse and global environment. Strong showings in **facilities (4)**, **professors (4)**, and **value (4)** suggest a well-resourced and effective academic experience. However, the university faces significant challenges in **accommodation (1)**, which is rated very poorly, and a less favorable **location (2)**. **Student life (3)** sits at an average level.
With a 4.46/5 average, ~92% of reviews are positive, highlighting a friendly environment, quality education, and development opportunities. A single negative review mentioned some departmental issues.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, approximately 75% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight outstanding classes and programs that align with career goals. A small amount of feedback noted slightly longer class times.
Nothing to show
Students praise the welcoming environment, beautiful campus, and excellent instruction. Amenities, clubs, and supportive staff are frequently highlighted. Educational opportunities and programs are also well-regarded. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
One review indicates a strong positive sentiment, with an average rating of 4/5. This feedback highlights career-oriented programs that build practical skills and improve international communication.
Sylhet's Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST) is a well-known university that has made significant growth. Various academic and extracurricular activities have elevated this university to national and worldwide prominence. Teachers and students participate in a variety of programs to help the institution become a centre of excellence. I got every opportunity to learn a lot as a computer science student.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
