LENS Escuela de Artes Visuales vs USTP – University of Applied Sciences St. Pölten vs Universidad de los Andes - ULA vs Colegio Universitario Hotel Escuela de Los Andes Venezolanos - UNATUR vs Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Dr. Cristóbal Mendoza - IUTCM
Side-by-side comparison from 129 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Supportive & approachable faculty
- +Practical, real-world focused education
- +Welcoming campus & international community
- +High academic excellence and expert professors
- +Focus on personal and professional growth
- +Strong ethical and values-based education
- +Hands-on learning and practical experience
- +Motivating teachers and pursuit of excellence
- +Specialization options and extracurricular events
- +Excellent teachers
- +Good career prospects
- +Excellent infrastructure
Nothing to show
- +High-quality education and dedicated professors
- +Welcoming campus environment and student support
- +Flexible learning options and research opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Unresponsive or unhelpful administrative and management staff.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and technology.
- -Lack of clear communication regarding policies and expectations.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources like functioning equipment.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and inefficient processes.
- -Limited access to necessary support services and a lack of flexibility from staff.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum content is a significant drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support from faculty and staff are often mentioned.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues hinder course availability and support.
- -Poorly taught courses and unsupportive faculty are a significant concern.
- -University administration is unresponsive to student concerns and protests.
Nothing to show
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Accommodation stands out with a perfect score, alongside excellent marks for Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all at 4.75. Facilities and Location are also highly rated at 4.67. The only area not achieving a perfect or near-perfect score is Facilities, though it remains very strong.
Overall, this institution receives strong marks for its faculty, with a perfect score for professors. Value is also a significant strength. However, accommodation stands out as a considerable weakness, scoring the lowest. The university also performs moderately well in facilities and student life, while location and internationality are rated acceptably.
Across all surveyed categories, the university received a rating of zero for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses were identified in the provided data. Therefore, no specific areas stand out as particularly high or low performing.
This institution presents a uniform rating across all assessed aspects. Consequently, no particular strengths or weaknesses can be identified within the provided data. The university received identical scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, indicating an average or baseline performance across the board.
Nothing to show
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates strong performance in **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.35. **Location** also received a favorable score of 4.28. The **weakest area** appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.91. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value fall within a generally positive range, indicating a solid overall student experience.
Nothing to show
All 6 reviews are positive, rating the university an average of 4.83/5. Students highlight approachable professors, practical classes, and a welcoming, modern campus. They feel supported and express pride in their academic and personal growth.
With a ~89% positive sentiment, students praise the university's academic excellence, expert professors, and focus on personal/professional growth. Some note the program's scope and relevance. No negative feedback was provided.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of students rating it 4–5 stars. The average rating is 4/5, indicating a highly satisfactory experience focused on practical learning and motivated instructors.
With a single review, the university is rated a perfect 5/5. This feedback highlighted excellent teachers, strong career prospects, and ideal infrastructure. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
~96% of reviews are positive, highlighting good teaching, learning environment, and opportunities. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions concerns with course availability and program support.
Nothing to show
Coming to USTP was more than just starting a degree, it was the beginning of finding myself. I came in unsure, a little overwhelmed, but quickly found a place where I felt seen, heard, and challenged in the best way. The professors didn’t just teach, they believed in me. I still remember the moment my lecturer told me, "You have something unique, use it." That changed everything. I went on to lead a student media project that got recognized at a national event, something I never imagined doing before. Campus life felt like a family. From late-night study sessions to creative workshops and international friendships, it was a mix of hard work, laughter, and growth. St. Pölten gave me more than an education, it gave me confidence, purpose, and unforgettable memories. If you’re looking for a place that will help you find your voice and push you to grow, this is it.
the chemical engineering study is a demanding university, always picks up in the ranking of the best university in the country, although in my career there are deficiencies in the reagents of laboratories because of the economic crisis that we live today since most of the reagents are imported
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Months before I was due to graduate, I faced harassment from two Physics and Astronomy department heads due to having a disability. I submitted a harassment complaint and instead of resolving the situation, the dean of the science faculty, the vice provost student experience and vice provost EDI retaliated and I had to deal with assault from an associate dean. The math courses, physics courses and computer science courses I took were universally poorly taught, and poorly administered. There is no support for students with disabilities and those who are othered are treated harshly and unfairly.