Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon - INSA vs Iuav University of Venice vs WCC Aeronautical and Technological College - WCC-ATC vs STI Colleges vs Indonesia Institute of Technology - ITI
Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong engineering focus and good teaching quality.
- +Pleasant campus environment with ample green spaces and on-site dorms.
- +Passionate and expert professors
- +English-taught programs for international students
- +Inspiring workshops and well-maintained facilities
- +Hands-on, precise aviation training
- +Strong career focus
- +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
- +Excellent facilities and comfortable campus environment
- +Well-equipped labs and spacious library with good resources
- +Clean and well-maintained sports areas and student lounges
- +Quality education and holistic development (social, leadership)
- +Dedicated and passionate professors
- +Accessible education and scholarships
- +Quality education and academic reputation
- +Personal growth and development through activities
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are recurring complaints.
- -Poor academic support and unprofessional/racist professor conduct
- -Inadequate facilities and poor student experience
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and delays.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and limited student support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
- -Ineffective teaching and uninspired curriculum are major dissatisfactions.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance
- -Unresponsive administration and management
- -Lack of academic support and clear communication
Across all surveyed categories, the university received ratings of zero, indicating no discernible strengths or weaknesses. This uniform scoring suggests a consistent lack of positive or negative attributes in areas such as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as particularly high or low performing.
This university demonstrates a particularly strong performance in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.2. Student Life and Internationality are also well-regarded, both scoring 3.8 and 3.6 respectively. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 2.6, indicating room for improvement. The university also received solid, average scores in Facilities and Professors.
This institution garners strong marks across most areas, with an outstanding score of 5 for its facilities. Professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received solid ratings of 4. The primary area for potential improvement, based on these scores, would be further enhancement of existing facilities to build upon its current strength.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.
A mixed performance emerges from these university ratings, with notable strengths and significant weaknesses. The institution excels in its **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are areas of concern, each scoring a low 1. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 3, while the **Value** is rated a respectable 4, suggesting a generally positive return on investment despite specific drawbacks.
This institution excels in several key aspects, boasting perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, and accommodation. Its value for money is also well-regarded, receiving a rating of 4. However, student life appears to be a significant area for improvement, with a score of 0. Internationality received a moderate rating of 3.
This university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are particularly well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and internationality also score highly. Facilities and accommodation are rated well, as is the overall value. The location, while good, is the lowest-rated category but still solid.
With an average rating of 4/5, this university is praised for its technical programs and spacious campus with green areas and on-site dorms. ~0% of feedback indicates minor areas for improvement.
Roughly 80% of reviews are positive, praising passionate professors and interesting workshops. Some mention minor issues with course coherence and professor availability. About 20% of feedback is negative, with one review citing unhelpful and racist professors.
The sole review is positive (100%), highlighting excellent, hands-on aviation education. The average rating is 4 out of 5 stars.
All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is praised for its excellent facilities and pleasant campus environment. Negative feedback is absent.
This university receives universally positive feedback. Students praise quality education and professors' dedication. The sole review highlights an enriching social and leadership experience.
Nearly all (approximately 100%) of 14 reviews are positive, highlighting quality education, interactive classes, approachable professors, and personal growth opportunities. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
y time in UCB has been one of the most memorable and precious parts of my teen life. It was where I experienced so many firsts—new friendships, challenges, and moments that shaped who I am today. Every day brought something new to learn, not just in the classroom, but about life, people, and myself. UCB became more than just a place to study—it was a space where I grew, laughed, stumbled, and stood back up. Those years will always hold a special place in my heart, a chapter filled with growth and unforgettable memories. uring my time as a senior high student at the University of Cebu Banilad campus, I learned how to be flexible and adaptable. Balancing academics, responsibilities, and personal life wasn’t always easy, but it taught me the value of time and resilience. Along the way, I met new friends who stood by me through every high and low. They’ve become some of the people I treasure the most, turning ordinary days into unforgettable ones. With them, I discovered not just how to manage life, but how to enjoy it fully—even in the busiest moments.