Escuela Superior de Diseño de Madrid vs École Supérieure d'ingénieurs d'Afrique Centrale vs University Institute of Great Schools of the Tropic - IUGET vs Douala University - UD vs University Institute of the Gulf of Guinea - IUG

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University Institute of the Gulf of Guinea - IUG (4.50)
Escuela Superior de Diseño de Madrid: wins 0/7 categories
École Supérieure d'ingénieurs d'Afrique Centrale: wins 0/7 categories
University Institute of Great Schools of the Tropic - IUGET: wins 1/7 categories
Douala University - UD: wins 0/7 categories
University Institute of the Gulf of Guinea - IUG: wins 1/7 categories
Skyhigh University: wins 0/7 categories
Harbin Engineering University: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Sociology and Social Research
Best programme: Human Resource Management
Douala, Cameroon
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
3.00
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.33
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.67
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
1.67
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
3.33
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
3.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
2.67
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Early specialization and practical experience in design fields
  • +Public university option for design in Madrid

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Adaptability and resilience fostered by challenging logistics
  • +Engaging learning environment despite resource constraints
  • +Community and student resourcefulness
  • +Excellent campus environment and facilities
  • +High-quality, expert faculty and rigorous academics
  • +Career-focused education and skill development

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming international student support
  • +Excellent academic platforms, enabling continuity
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of student support and unresponsive staff are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not adequately preparing students for future careers.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Ineffective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a consistent, though unexceptional, profile across all assessed aspects. None of the surveyed categories – facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value – stand out as particular strengths. Conversely, there are no areas that can be identified as significant weaknesses, with all receiving identical, neutral ratings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university's strengths lie in its prime location, receiving a high rating of 4.33. The student life and professor quality also score well, both above 3.3. Conversely, internationality is a significant weakness, with a score of 1.67, and accommodation is also rated low at 2.67. Facilities and overall value sit at a moderate 3.

This institution presents a commendable overall profile. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, include **Professors** and **Student Life**. On the other end, **Facilities** and **Internationality** are noted as comparatively weaker, though still solid with 3.5 ratings. The **Location** and **Accomodation** received strong marks at 4, while **Value** also scored well at 4.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodations**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. These aspects likely contribute significantly to a positive student experience. Conversely, the **Location** received a lower rating of 3, indicating it may not be as advantageous as other aspects. Professors are rated well at 4, suggesting a generally strong academic staff.

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university receives a 4/5 average rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight it as a strong choice for those with clear design specialization goals, appreciating the early practical experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.33/5 average rating from 3 reviews, ~33% were positive. One positive review highlighted adaptability and resilience in navigating hall challenges. No negative feedback was provided.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.5/5, student reviews highlight a great experience. Recurring themes include a calm, neat campus conducive to studying, well-equipped facilities, and qualified, committed lecturers.

Nothing to show

With one review, this university receives an average of 4/5 stars. The feedback highlights excellent treatment of international students and amazing academic platforms, even during COVID-19. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
100%
0%
0%
33%
50%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
100%
67%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close