Tarumanagara University - UNTAR vs University of Indonesia - UI vs Gunadarma University vs Pancasila University vs Jakarta State Polytechnic
Side-by-side comparison from 55 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and accreditation
- +Supportive lecturers and peer collaboration
- +Diverse programs and international opportunities
- +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
- +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
- +Supportive community and valuable alumni network
- +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
- +Good facilities and helpful tutors
- +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
- +Engaging and diverse teaching methods
- +Inspiring and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive and inspiring lecturers
- +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
- +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
- +Improved campus facilities
- +Practical application and project engagement
- +Comprehensive curriculum coverage
- +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
- +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content and delivery are often perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
- -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
- -Substandard experience for international students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
- -Frequent administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
- -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
- -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in its Professors, Location, and Accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with very high marks. The university's Internationality is its relatively weakest area, though still strong at 4.6. Overall, it presents a highly appealing educational environment.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.
Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.
With an excellent overall profile, the university shines particularly brightly in its **location and student life**, both receiving perfect and near-perfect scores respectively. Professors and accommodation also garnered strong marks. While the **internationality** rating is a moderate 3.5, indicating room for growth, the overall experience is highly positive, reflected in the consistent 4-4.5 star ratings across most aspects.
This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.
The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.
Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.
All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students praise academic excellence and strong career preparation, highlighting supportive lecturers and vibrant campus life.
University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
Both reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight inspiring teaching methods, hybrid learning, and engaging lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.
With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.
This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.
All I can say about my university was like the root of my wonderful journey in life. I first learned about connecting with people through education was started here. Learning to become someone who could be a helper in the future for other's life. And indeed, throughout the long journey after my campus life, I found many things to be grateful for. And I am so proud that I was one of the alumni from this university
I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show