Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Yarsi University vs Universitas MH Thamrin vs Jayabaya University vs Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 0/2 categories
Yarsi University: wins 2/2 categories
Universitas MH Thamrin: wins 0/2 categories
Jayabaya University: wins 0/2 categories
Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama: wins 0/2 categories
Universitas Nasional - UNAS: wins 0/2 categories
STIE Indonesia Jakarta: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Hospital and Healthcare Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: International Relations
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
5.00
4.00
5.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.15
5.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
4.50
Professors
4.64
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Internationality
4.71
5.00
Win
3.50
3.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.21
5.00
4.50
5.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.57
5.00
Win
4.50
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Accommodation
4.38
5.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
  • +Cleanliness and modern facilities
  • +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
  • +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi
  • +Relevant programs and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical learning and industry partnerships
  • +Dynamic and critical idea exchange
  • +Practical application and project engagement
  • +Comprehensive curriculum coverage
  • +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.

Nothing to show

  • +Strong practical and theoretical business and economics programs
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Real-world application and industry relevance
Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from faculty and administration.
  • -Lack of career support and relevant industry connections.
  • -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.

This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Notably, its **Professors** and **Accomodation** received perfect marks, indicating exceptional quality in teaching and living arrangements. **Student Life** and **Value** also scored very highly, suggesting a vibrant campus experience and good return on investment. The university's **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. The lowest rating was for **Internationality**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.

The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all consistently rated at a solid 4 stars, indicating well-rounded strengths. No specific areas were rated below 4 stars.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a great and relevant campus with diverse programs, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent resources. Practical learning and industry partnerships are appreciated.

This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight enriching educational experiences, well-designed curricula blending theory with practical application, and knowledgeable, invested faculty.

Rating distribution
5★
64%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
50%
4★
36%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close