Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Gunadarma University vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI vs Universitas Trilogi vs Jakarta State Polytechnic

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama (5.00)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 5/7 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 0/7 categories
Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI: wins 1/7 categories
Universitas Trilogi: wins 0/7 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama: wins 1/7 categories
STIE Indonesia Jakarta: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Accounting
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: International Relations
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.54
Win
4.17
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.00
Location
4.08
4.50
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
4.50
Professors
4.69
Win
4.50
4.33
Not rated
3.50
4.00
4.50
Internationality
4.85
Win
4.00
3.67
Not rated
2.50
3.00
4.00
Student life
4.23
4.17
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
Value
4.62
Win
4.50
4.00
Not rated
3.00
4.00
4.50
Accommodation
4.42
Win
4.17
3.33
Not rated
3.00
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse programs and career prospects
  • +Engaging extracurriculars and personal growth opportunities
  • +Excellent lecturers and accommodating facilities
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse range of programs and majors
  • +Good course material and practical applications

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.
  • +Strong practical and theoretical business and economics programs
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Real-world application and industry relevance
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of adequate support and communication is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Across multiple categories, this university garners strong evaluations. Internationality stands out as its most exceptional area, reflected in a near-perfect score. Professors and value also receive highly positive feedback. The university's weakest aspect, though still well-regarded, is its location. Student life, accommodation, and facilities are all rated very favorably as well.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.

Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all consistently rated at a solid 4 stars, indicating well-rounded strengths. No specific areas were rated below 4 stars.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 13 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.69/5. Students highlight abundant study programs, engaging student organizations, and supportive lecturers. Facilities are frequently praised as modern and accommodating, fostering personal growth and social connections.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.

Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight enriching educational experiences, well-designed curricula blending theory with practical application, and knowledgeable, invested faculty.

Rating distribution
5★
69%
50%
33%
0%
0%
100%
50%
4★
31%
50%
67%
0%
50%
0%
50%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close