Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Gunadarma University vs Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Pancasila University vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pancasila University (5.00)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 2/6 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 0/6 categories
Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ: wins 0/6 categories
Pancasila University: wins 0/6 categories
Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI: wins 0/6 categories
Jakarta State University: wins 4/6 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Food Industry
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
Win
4.17
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.33
Not rated
Location
4.15
4.50
Not rated
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.64
4.50
Not rated
4.50
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.71
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.50
3.67
4.67
Not rated
Student life
4.21
4.17
Not rated
4.50
4.50
4.67
Win
Not rated
Value
4.57
4.50
Not rated
4.50
4.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.38
4.17
Not rated
4.50
3.33
4.67
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging and diverse teaching methods
  • +Inspiring and practical learning experiences
  • +Supportive and inspiring lecturers
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse range of programs and majors
  • +Good course material and practical applications
  • +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
  • +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
  • +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Frequent administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

With an excellent overall profile, the university shines particularly brightly in its **location and student life**, both receiving perfect and near-perfect scores respectively. Professors and accommodation also garnered strong marks. While the **internationality** rating is a moderate 3.5, indicating room for growth, the overall experience is highly positive, reflected in the consistent 4-4.5 star ratings across most aspects.

Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Both reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight inspiring teaching methods, hybrid learning, and engaging lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
64%
50%
0%
100%
33%
67%
0%
4★
36%
50%
0%
0%
67%
33%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close