Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Gunadarma University vs Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Yarsi University vs Tanri Abeng University - TAU
Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
- +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
- +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
- +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
- +Good facilities and helpful tutors
- +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
Nothing to show
- +Cleanliness and modern facilities
- +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
- +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi
Nothing to show
- +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
- +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
- +Strong practical and theoretical business and economics programs
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Real-world application and industry relevance
- -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
- -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.
Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.
Nothing to show
This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.
Nothing to show
Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.
Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all consistently rated at a solid 4 stars, indicating well-rounded strengths. No specific areas were rated below 4 stars.
All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.
Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight enriching educational experiences, well-designed curricula blending theory with practical application, and knowledgeable, invested faculty.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show