Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Pancasila University vs Jakarta State University vs Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun
Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse programs and career prospects
- +Engaging extracurriculars and personal growth opportunities
- +Excellent lecturers and accommodating facilities
- +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
- +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
- +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
- +Engaging and diverse teaching methods
- +Inspiring and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive and inspiring lecturers
- +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
- +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
- +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
Nothing to show
- +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
- +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of adequate support and communication is a problem.
- -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
- -Frequent administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
Nothing to show
Across multiple categories, this university garners strong evaluations. Internationality stands out as its most exceptional area, reflected in a near-perfect score. Professors and value also receive highly positive feedback. The university's weakest aspect, though still well-regarded, is its location. Student life, accommodation, and facilities are all rated very favorably as well.
With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.
With an excellent overall profile, the university shines particularly brightly in its **location and student life**, both receiving perfect and near-perfect scores respectively. Professors and accommodation also garnered strong marks. While the **internationality** rating is a moderate 3.5, indicating room for growth, the overall experience is highly positive, reflected in the consistent 4-4.5 star ratings across most aspects.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.
Nothing to show
Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.
Nothing to show
All 13 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.69/5. Students highlight abundant study programs, engaging student organizations, and supportive lecturers. Facilities are frequently praised as modern and accommodating, fostering personal growth and social connections.
With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.
Both reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight inspiring teaching methods, hybrid learning, and engaging lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show