Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs University of Indonesia - UI vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Gunadarma University vs Yarsi University

Side-by-side comparison from 77 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 0/7 categories
University of Indonesia - UI: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 0/7 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 0/7 categories
Yarsi University: wins 7/7 categories
Universitas Pertamina: wins 0/7 categories
STIE Indonesia Jakarta: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Art and Design
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
4.22
4.28
4.17
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.15
4.37
4.59
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Professors
4.64
4.50
4.17
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Internationality
4.71
4.33
4.17
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.21
4.42
4.17
4.17
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.57
4.42
4.39
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Accommodation
4.38
4.14
4.13
4.17
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
  • +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
  • +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
  • +Supportive community and valuable alumni network
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
  • +Cleanliness and modern facilities
  • +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
  • +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi

Nothing to show

  • +Strong practical and theoretical business and economics programs
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Real-world application and industry relevance
Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
  • -Substandard experience for international students.
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all consistently rated at a solid 4 stars, indicating well-rounded strengths. No specific areas were rated below 4 stars.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.

Nothing to show

Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight enriching educational experiences, well-designed curricula blending theory with practical application, and knowledgeable, invested faculty.

Rating distribution
5★
64%
64%
56%
50%
0%
0%
50%
4★
36%
31%
39%
50%
100%
0%
50%
3★
0%
3%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

International student office

I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close