Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI vs Universitas MH Thamrin vs Jakarta State University

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universitas MH Thamrin (5.00)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 2/6 categories
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 0/6 categories
Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas MH Thamrin: wins 1/6 categories
Jakarta State University: wins 3/6 categories
Politeknik APP Jakarta: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Accounting
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Hospital and Healthcare Management
Best programme: Food Industry
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Trade
Category ratings
Facilities
4.54
Win
4.25
4.00
4.00
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.08
4.75
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.69
4.75
4.33
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.85
Win
4.75
3.67
3.50
4.67
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.23
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.62
4.50
4.00
4.50
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.42
4.00
3.33
5.00
Win
4.67
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse programs and career prospects
  • +Engaging extracurriculars and personal growth opportunities
  • +Excellent lecturers and accommodating facilities
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse range of programs and majors
  • +Good course material and practical applications
  • +Relevant programs and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical learning and industry partnerships
  • +Dynamic and critical idea exchange
  • +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
  • +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
  • +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
  • +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
  • +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of adequate support and communication is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from faculty and administration.
  • -Lack of career support and relevant industry connections.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across multiple categories, this university garners strong evaluations. Internationality stands out as its most exceptional area, reflected in a near-perfect score. Professors and value also receive highly positive feedback. The university's weakest aspect, though still well-regarded, is its location. Student life, accommodation, and facilities are all rated very favorably as well.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.

This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Notably, its **Professors** and **Accomodation** received perfect marks, indicating exceptional quality in teaching and living arrangements. **Student Life** and **Value** also scored very highly, suggesting a vibrant campus experience and good return on investment. The university's **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. The lowest rating was for **Internationality**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.

Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 13 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.69/5. Students highlight abundant study programs, engaging student organizations, and supportive lecturers. Facilities are frequently praised as modern and accommodating, fostering personal growth and social connections.

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a great and relevant campus with diverse programs, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent resources. Practical learning and industry partnerships are appreciated.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
69%
50%
33%
100%
67%
0%
0%
4★
31%
50%
67%
0%
33%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close