Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Pancasila University vs Universitas Pertamina vs Tanri Abeng University - TAU

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pancasila University (5.00)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 1/6 categories
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 1/6 categories
Pancasila University: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas Pertamina: wins 0/6 categories
Tanri Abeng University - TAU: wins 0/6 categories
Jakarta State University: wins 4/6 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Food Industry
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
Win
4.25
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Location
4.15
4.75
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.64
4.75
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.71
4.75
Win
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Student life
4.21
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
Value
4.57
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.38
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
  • +Engaging and diverse teaching methods
  • +Inspiring and practical learning experiences
  • +Supportive and inspiring lecturers

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
  • +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
  • +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
  • -Frequent administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

With an excellent overall profile, the university shines particularly brightly in its **location and student life**, both receiving perfect and near-perfect scores respectively. Professors and accommodation also garnered strong marks. While the **internationality** rating is a moderate 3.5, indicating room for growth, the overall experience is highly positive, reflected in the consistent 4-4.5 star ratings across most aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

Both reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight inspiring teaching methods, hybrid learning, and engaging lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
64%
50%
100%
0%
0%
67%
0%
4★
36%
50%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close