Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Gunadarma University vs Esa Unggul University - UEU vs Jakarta State Polytechnic

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bina Nusantara University - UBN (4.60)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 0/7 categories
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 2/7 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 0/7 categories
Esa Unggul University - UEU: wins 5/7 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
Politeknik APP Jakarta: wins 0/7 categories
University of Bunda Mulia - UBM: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Trade
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
4.25
4.17
4.50
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.15
4.75
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.64
4.75
Win
4.50
4.50
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.71
4.75
Win
4.00
4.50
2.50
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.21
4.00
4.17
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.57
4.50
4.50
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.38
4.00
4.17
4.50
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
  • +Accessible location and engaging classroom environment
  • +Supportive and guiding lecturers
  • +Opportunities for critical thinking and discussion
  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
  • +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a problem.
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths across multiple facets. Its location and student life receive perfect scores, while facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. Value also stands out with a perfect score. While all areas are strong, the university truly excels in providing an exceptional student experience and an advantageous location.

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the strategic location and accessible campus. They also highlight caring lecturers who provide guidance and encourage critical thinking.

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
64%
50%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
36%
50%
50%
50%
50%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Best private universities in Jakarta

The esa unggul campus is one of the best private universities in the city of Jakarta with a strategic location, easily accessible by various modes of public transportation. With an attractive classroom atmosphere and professional classroom teachers, it creates an informative class.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close