Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta - UIN vs LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Universitas Pertamina vs Universitas Trilogi

Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bina Nusantara University - UBN (4.60)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 3/7 categories
State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta - UIN: wins 2/7 categories
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 2/7 categories
Universitas Pertamina: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Trilogi: wins 0/7 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
Politeknik APP Jakarta: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: English Literature
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Trade
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
Win
3.00
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
4.15
4.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Professors
4.64
4.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Internationality
4.71
5.00
Win
4.75
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
4.00
Student life
4.21
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Value
4.57
Win
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.38
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
  • +Integration of Islamic values with modern sciences
  • +Opportunities for personal, spiritual, and leadership growth
  • +Active student organizations and extracurricular involvement
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
  • +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

With impressive scores in Student Life and Internationality, this institution shines. Its professors, location, accommodation, and overall value are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded experience. The weakest area, Facilities, still received a respectable score, suggesting room for improvement but not a significant detractor from the overall positive assessment.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is largely positive (~100% positive reviews). Students highlight a unique blend of Islamic values and modern sciences, alongside active student organizations and community involvement opportunities.

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
64%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
36%
100%
50%
0%
0%
50%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close