Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta - UIN vs LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Gunadarma University
Side-by-side comparison from 43 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
- +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
- +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
- +Integration of Islamic values with modern sciences
- +Opportunities for personal, spiritual, and leadership growth
- +Active student organizations and extracurricular involvement
- +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
- +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
- +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
- +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
- +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
- +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
- +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
- +Good facilities and helpful tutors
- +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
- -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.
With impressive scores in Student Life and Internationality, this institution shines. Its professors, location, accommodation, and overall value are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded experience. The weakest area, Facilities, still received a respectable score, suggesting room for improvement but not a significant detractor from the overall positive assessment.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.
With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.
Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.
With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is largely positive (~100% positive reviews). Students highlight a unique blend of Islamic values and modern sciences, alongside active student organizations and community involvement opportunities.
All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.
With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show