Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Tarumanagara University - UNTAR vs University of Indonesia - UI vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI vs Jayabaya University
Side-by-side comparison from 64 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
- +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
- +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
- +Strong academic reputation and accreditation
- +Supportive lecturers and peer collaboration
- +Diverse programs and international opportunities
- +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
- +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
- +Supportive community and valuable alumni network
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse range of programs and majors
- +Good course material and practical applications
- +Practical application and project engagement
- +Comprehensive curriculum coverage
- +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
- +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
- +Strong practical and theoretical business and economics programs
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Real-world application and industry relevance
- -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content and delivery are often perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
- -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
- -Substandard experience for international students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
- -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in its Professors, Location, and Accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with very high marks. The university's Internationality is its relatively weakest area, though still strong at 4.6. Overall, it presents a highly appealing educational environment.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.
Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.
The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.
Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.
Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all consistently rated at a solid 4 stars, indicating well-rounded strengths. No specific areas were rated below 4 stars.
All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.
All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students praise academic excellence and strong career preparation, highlighting supportive lecturers and vibrant campus life.
University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.
This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.
Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight enriching educational experiences, well-designed curricula blending theory with practical application, and knowledgeable, invested faculty.
Nothing to show
All I can say about my university was like the root of my wonderful journey in life. I first learned about connecting with people through education was started here. Learning to become someone who could be a helper in the future for other's life. And indeed, throughout the long journey after my campus life, I found many things to be grateful for. And I am so proud that I was one of the alumni from this university
I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show