Escuela Universitaria de Diseño e Ingeniería de Barcelona - ELISAVA vs Joaquim Chissano University - UJC vs Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM vs Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram vs University Universidad Fernando Pessoa - UFP-C
Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring creative environment with practical, hands-on learning.
- +Strong international community and networking with professionals.
- +Engaging projects fostering idea realization and interdisciplinary collaboration.
Nothing to show
- +High academic quality and qualified professors
- +Free tuition and accessible entry
- +Good reputation and campus environment
Nothing to show
- +Broadened perspectives and enriched understanding.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Experiencing unhelpful, expensive education with little practical application or support.
- -Facing a curriculum perceived as irrelevant, overly conceptual, and lacking real-world career preparation.
- -Struggling with unsupportive and inaccessible faculty, especially for those without prior design backgrounds.
Nothing to show
- -Excessive administrative and communication problems.
- -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
- -Insufficient resources and support for students.
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management hinder academic progress.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create an uncomfortable learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and career support leave students feeling unprepared for the future.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, this university garners moderate ratings across various aspects. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving a high score. Conversely, **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Facilities fall within a similar, average range, with Internationality and Value also scoring below average.
Nothing to show
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The highest marks were achieved in **Value** (4.6) and **Professors** and **Internationality** (both 4.2), indicating significant strengths in these areas. Conversely, the university received its lowest scores for **Accomodation** (3), followed closely by **Facilities** and **Location** (both 3.2). Student life received a moderate rating of 3.4.
Nothing to show
This institution garners an outstanding score for its facilities and location. Students also report a positive experience with student life, accommodation, and its international outlook, all receiving solid ratings. While professors are well-regarded, this area presents the only slight dip from the otherwise exceptional scores, suggesting it's the weakest point in an otherwise highly favorable review. Overall, the university offers strong value.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
About 57% of reviews highlight a creative, international environment with practical projects and industry connections. However, roughly 43% criticize a pretentious curriculum, a lack of practical skills, and feeling unsupported or that the education is overpriced.
Nothing to show
With a ~4/5 average rating, nearly all reviews praise the university's qualified staff and academic quality. Some mention challenges like course length and subject availability.
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars, indicating generally positive feedback. Alternative learning platforms are noted as beneficial for deepening understanding and broadening knowledge. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The way the Departments treat the students are notable and the situation of the University in one of the most important and old part of the city, as well the projects are interesting, we capture all the essence and bring with as a lugagge of experiences
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show