Escuela Universitaria de Diseño e Ingeniería de Barcelona - ELISAVA vs University of Medical Sciences and Technology - UMST vs Sudan University for Science and Technology vs University of Khartoum - UofK vs The National Ribat University - NRU
Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring creative environment with practical, hands-on learning.
- +Strong international community and networking with professionals.
- +Engaging projects fostering idea realization and interdisciplinary collaboration.
- +High-quality education and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive and inspiring campus environment
- +Strong faculty and well-structured academic programs
- +Engaging lectures and active student community
- +Extensive social events and party scene
- +Accessible educational support
- +Academic and social growth opportunities
- +Comprehensive and relevant course content
- +Diverse and engaging community
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Experiencing unhelpful, expensive education with little practical application or support.
- -Facing a curriculum perceived as irrelevant, overly conceptual, and lacking real-world career preparation.
- -Struggling with unsupportive and inaccessible faculty, especially for those without prior design backgrounds.
- -Administrative and management issues make the university experience difficult and unresponsive to student needs.
- -The course content and assessments lack depth and thoroughness, leaving students feeling unprepared.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unsupportive instructors are prevalent complaints.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, this university garners moderate ratings across various aspects. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving a high score. Conversely, **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Facilities fall within a similar, average range, with Internationality and Value also scoring below average.
This university demonstrates strong performance in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** emerged as the weakest area, scoring lowest among the evaluated aspects. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value received solid, mid-range scores, indicating a generally well-rounded experience with a standout location. Accommodations also scored reasonably well.
This institution received its highest marks for student life, boasting a rating of 3.33. Other areas, such as location and internationality, also performed reasonably well with scores of 2.67. Conversely, the university's weakest areas were facilities and accommodation, both receiving a rating of 2. The value proposition for students was rated at a solid 3.
This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. It excels significantly in Student Life, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, Location and Internationality are identified as its weakest aspects, both receiving low marks. Other categories like Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately, while Professors and Value are strong points.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
About 57% of reviews highlight a creative, international environment with practical projects and industry connections. However, roughly 43% criticize a pretentious curriculum, a lack of practical skills, and feeling unsupported or that the education is overpriced.
~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, practical learning, and a supportive environment. ~22% of feedback mentions issues with unfocused courses and administrative challenges.
With a 3.33/5 average, ~33% of feedback is positive. One reviewer found education good but mentioned varying doctor quality, long lectures, and many parties. No negative reviews were provided.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives largely positive feedback. Students highlight academic growth, diverse course offerings, and a rich social experience within a diverse community. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The way the Departments treat the students are notable and the situation of the University in one of the most important and old part of the city, as well the projects are interesting, we capture all the essence and bring with as a lugagge of experiences
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show