Madrid School of Marketing - MSMK vs Nazarbayev University - NU vs Instituto Tecnológico Superior de San Pedro de las Colonias - Tec San Pedro vs Kostanay Engineering and Economics University vs University Of Central Punjab - UCP
Side-by-side comparison from 92 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and expert faculty providing practical, up-to-date education
- +Vibrant and inclusive student community with excellent facilities
- +Hands-on practice opportunities and international exposure
- +Engaging teaching with real-world relevance
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Enriching campus life and culture
- +Supportive atmosphere and competent, caring teachers
- +Comprehensive programs and well-maintained facilities
- +Staff accessibility and student support
- +Practical, hands-on learning with relevant industry skills.
- +Accessible and flexible learning options, including distance education and technology.
- +Supportive faculty and opportunities for student leadership and development.
- +High-quality, practical teaching and experienced faculty
- +Positive and welcoming campus environment with good facilities
- +Opportunities for financial stability and career advancement
- +Excellent faculty and staff support
- +Quality education and knowledge
- +Positive campus environment and discipline
- +Strong community and professor support
- +Valuable academic support services
- +Positive campus life experiences
- -Unprofessional and unfair treatment from staff.
- -Lack of transparency and issues with refunds.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Arrogant teachers and lack of student support, especially for evening classes.
- -Obscure career guidance and insufficient preparation for the job market.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and engagement.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Poor basic facilities and uncomfortable living conditions
- -Overcrowded spaces and limited study areas
- -Low quality canteen food and inadequate prayer facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure need improvement.
- -Lack of proper resources and support hinders student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
The university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Location** and **Professors**, both receiving scores above 3.4. Facilities and Accommodation are rated similarly at 3.225. Areas for improvement are identified in **Student Life**, which scored the lowest at 2.725, followed closely by Value and Internationality.
This institution receives excellent feedback, particularly for its **Accomodation**, which is rated the highest at 4.625. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score remarkably well, both above 4.57. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.97. Other areas like Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.36.
With uniformly average scores across all assessed aspects, the university presents a consistent but unremarkable profile. No specific area stands out as particularly strong or weak, indicating a balanced, albeit unexceptional, experience for students in facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality. The value for money also reflects this middling performance.
Presenting a uniform score of zero across all surveyed categories, this university demonstrates a consistent lack of exceptional performance in any given area. From facilities and professors to location and student life, no aspect emerged as a particular strength. Similarly, accommodation, internationality, and overall value also received no positive distinction, indicating a consistent absence of standout features or areas of excellence according to the ratings provided.
This university garners strong marks, particularly for its professors and facilities, both scoring above 4.4. Student life and location also receive favorable ratings. Areas for potential improvement include internationality and accommodation, which are rated lower than other aspects. The overall value is considered good, with a rating above 4.0.
This institution scores exceptionally well in **location**, achieving a remarkable 4.67 out of 5. Other strong areas include **professors**, **student life**, and **value**, all rated at a solid 4.1. Conversely, **accommodation** emerged as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.4. **Facilities** and **internationality** fall in the mid-range, at 3.9 and 3.7 respectively.
This institution receives outstanding marks across the board, with a perfect 5/5 rating in every assessed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all considered exemplary. This suggests a consistently strong and comprehensive university experience, with no specific areas identified as needing improvement.
Approximately 83% of reviews are positive, praising supportive staff, practical education, and expert professors. A small portion of negative feedback, about 17%, mentions issues with refunds and unprofessional staff behavior.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a 4.43 average rating. Students praise well-rounded education, engaging professors, lively campus life, and excellent facilities.
With a 3.2/5 average rating, roughly 40% of reviews are negative. Positive feedback highlights excellent atmosphere and competent, caring teachers. Negative points mention arrogant staff and insufficient support for certain student groups.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students appreciate distance learning, practical application, entrepreneurship skills, and challenging tasks from instructors.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting impressive teaching, financial stability, and a good campus experience. A small percentage of negative feedback mentioned issues with facilities and overcrowding.
With an average rating of 4.3/5, ~80% of 10 reviews are positive, highlighting good discipline, faculty efforts, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) exists.
This university has received a single review, which is overwhelmingly positive with a 5/5 rating. The student praised the beautiful environment, tight-knit community, and exceptional support from departments like tutor and counseling centers. There were no negative reviews.
The best thing of this university are the professors and the background they have, you can learn a lot about all of them, each one is focus on different marketing areas which is very good to have a wider perspective of being creative and all what it implies. As the program is not long each subject takes around 4 to 5 days, so i will recommend you to don't miss any class because you can miss important details of some specific topic. In my opinion, doing this master helped me and encourage me to develop my creativity and communication skills not just in my professional life but also in my personal life, which for me is really good. Talking about facilities the university is small and has modern furniture and equipment, it is located in a good area and has metro and bus station close by, it doesn't have a cafeteria inside but it has vending machines and a restaurant downstairs. In general personnel that works here is friendly and willing to help when necessary.
I am a graduate of Master in Public Administration, year of 2019. The program was amazing as well as academic team of the School of Public Policy. The program is designed for working professionals with various backgrounds and interests which makes this program unique. Your groupmates are going to be from different age groups and work environments, but they will all share the same goal of succeeding in their career as well as sharpening their skills. Also this kind of diverse environment gives you a great chance to learn about other’s experiences and grasp an opinion on how dilemmas in civil service or public policy are solved in their organizations and companies. Professor’s were great from the very first day, and became our friends by the end of the program. All the books and materials used were in compliance with the international best practices and this opinion comes from a person who did his bachelor’s in California back in 2015. If you are seeking for a program that can challenge your professionalism do not hesitate to apply for this program or choose NU as your next place to start your studies.
Nothing to show
Hello! I studied at this university from 2009 to 2012, specializing in the organization of transportation, motion and the exploration of transport. It was a bachelor. I entered the university after graduating from college in this speciality, and I particularly liked that the teachers tried to expand their knowledge and gave tasks to complicate their implementation. Also worth mentioning is that I was given the opportunity to be the first chairman of the student council of the campus and develop its charter.
One of the worst universities i have ever been to. It was a huge mistake to study. They cannot even provide the basic facilities. No trees no AC for students in halls. Canteen food may cause food poisoning. In month of june and july it gets unbearable. Their prayer area is a JOKE, designated in second basement in a corner of parking garage where we pray for jummah and you cannot even imagine how bad it gets when 200 people pray together without ac or fans. I have not even started on the staff yet and this is how bad it is. PLEASE whatever you do dont take admission here. My entire degree felt like it was prison camp. They are creating building on top of building but they cannot create a simple garden or masjid. All they want is your money and could not care less about your education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show