HAN University of Applied Sciences vs Hereford College of Arts vs Champlain College vs St Xavier's College vs South Eastern Kenya University - seku

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
HAN University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/4 categories
Hereford College of Arts: wins 0/4 categories
Champlain College: wins 3/4 categories
St Xavier's College: wins 0/4 categories
South Eastern Kenya University - seku: wins 1/4 categories
New Anglia University: wins 0/4 categories
Tula State University - TulSU: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Hereford, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Burlington, Vermont, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Economics and Statistics
Best programme: Statistics
Anguilla, Anguilla
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: B.Sc. in Political Science: Global Politics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.29
Not rated
4.00
4.29
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Location
3.86
Not rated
5.00
5.00
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.43
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.57
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.14
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.43
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.29
Not rated
4.50
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.86
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.43
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, industry-relevant learning with engaged, experienced staff.
  • +Excellent facilities and a supportive, high-quality educational environment.
  • +Balanced student life opportunities with an international atmosphere.

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent, relevant, and timely career preparation
  • +Supportive and accessible professors
  • +Strong, award-winning program content
  • +Top-notch faculty and academic excellence
  • +Conducive environment for holistic development
  • +Strong placement assistance
  • +Conducive and enjoyable learning environment
  • +Quality education
  • +Peaceful and focused setting

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging subjects and knowledgeable professors
  • +Solid theoretical background
  • +Lack of practical experience
Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities are a recurring complaint.
  • -Unresponsive or unhelpful staff contribute to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff cause frustration.
  • -Limited course variety and a lack of engaging learning experiences are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Ineffective teaching and unsupportive faculty are frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, receiving a high rating of 4.43. Facilities and value are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.29. Conversely, the university's **location** and **accommodation** received the lowest marks at 3.86, suggesting these areas may warrant further attention for improvement. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well, with scores of 4.00 and 4.14 respectively.

Nothing to show

Remarkably strong scores characterize this institution, particularly for its professors, location, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded, scoring 4, while internationality and value stand out with impressive 4.5 ratings. The university excels in core academic and living aspects, with no areas falling below a solid 4.

With exceptional scores, this institution excels in both **Location** and **Value**, both receiving perfect marks. **Professors** also garnered a very high rating. Conversely, the university's **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, with the lowest scores in these categories. Facilities and student life received solid, above-average ratings.

Overall, the university showcases a strong profile with excellent scores in Facilities and Student Life, both receiving a perfect 5. Value also stands out with a 5-star rating. However, the Location presents a significant weakness, scoring a low 2. Professors and Internationality are rated moderately at 4 and 3 respectively, with Accomodation also falling in the middle at 3.

Nothing to show

With a stellar rating of 5, student life stands out as the university's strongest asset. Conversely, facilities, professors, and accommodation all received a moderate rating of 3, indicating areas for potential improvement. Location, internationality, and value are rated positively at 4, suggesting a good overall experience for students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~88% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars and an average of 4.25/5. Recurring themes include excellent facilities, supportive staff, and effective practical teaching. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

Nothing to show

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the university's ability to prepare them for life and their careers, highlighting valuable professors and excellent program-specific knowledge.

With a 4.86/5 average, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise top-notch professors, strong academic competition, dedicated placement cells, and an environment conducive to overall development.

The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Students praise the conducive learning environment and enjoyable experience. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight engaging programs and knowledgeable professors.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
0%
100%
86%
100%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
100%
3★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The content that is being provided within the course

The lesson materials we are receiving are quite interesting in regards to the course. We are learning about global issues and how to handle encountering different cultures as international social workers.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close