La Salle Almere vs Avondale College vs Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST vs Neapolis University Pafos vs Codenotch
Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and qualified faculty providing engaging guidance.
- +High-quality programs with a focus on student development.
- +Inspiring atmosphere and excellent facilities.
- +Strong professional experience and helpful professors
- +Diverse international student community
Nothing to show
- +Diverse range of medical programs
- +Positive and well-equipped university environment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
- -Unfair and suspicious grading system, particularly regarding thesis evaluation.
- -Lack of transparency and truthfulness in communication from the university and supervisors.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Academic and student life aspects generally shine, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.07) and **Location** (4.13) also scoring well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a clear area for improvement, indicated by the lowest rating (2.63). **Facilities** (3.69) and **Value** (3.75) fall in the mid-range, while **Internationality** (3.25) scores moderately.
With a solid overall performance, this institution excels in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received high marks, indicating a positive campus environment and convenient surroundings. However, the university's strongest areas are contrasted by lower scores for professors and internationality, suggesting potential room for improvement in academic support and global engagement. The value also appears to be a weaker point.
Nothing to show
Impressively, this institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** received no scores, indicating potential areas for development. **Professors** and **Value** were rated positively, suggesting a solid academic and financial offering.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.06/5, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly atmospheres, helpful teachers, and engaging classes. Negative feedback is minimal, representing about 0% of all feedback.
With an average rating of 2/5, negative feedback (~67%) dominates. Students express dissatisfaction with the grading system, citing unfairness and suspicion. One positive comment highlights valuable professional experience and helpful professors.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight the variety of medical programs and a good university environment with available facilities. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I had the worst possible experience during my diploma thesis grading, plus the overall grading system works in a very suspicious way and is totally unfair. My 1st degree is from an Engineering university (5years - integrated master) thus I had high expectations which were proven to be false. Throughout the thesis process, I was repeatedly assured that everything was progressing well. My supervisor gave me the impression that my work met all expectations and that my performance was strong. However, I was surprised and disheartened to receive a final thesis grade of 8/10, which was significantly lower than my average course grades, typically around 9/10. This discrepancy brought down my final degree average to 8.6, which does not reflect the overall quality and consistency of my academic performance. In higher level universities, you are supposed to get your best grade in your best project, which is your thesis, but not on Neapolis Pafos University apparently. Regarding my work, please note that even at my presentation everyone was thrilled about my work (I also answered every question with great success as they mentioned). All 3 supervisors congratulated me and then gave me an 8. I wanted some feedback, and I tried to call my supervisor but he rejected every single one of my calls!! Hilarious. The lack of alignment between the supervisor’s feedback and the final grade raises concerns about fairness and consistency in the grading system.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
