The Florence Institute of Design International - F.I.D.I. vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University vs Instituto Português de Administração de Marketing - IPAM vs FAST National University of Computing and Emerging Sciences - FAST NUCES vs Indonesia Institute of Technology - ITI
Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Transformative personal and professional growth
- +Exposure to captivating art and inspiring environments
- +High-quality, enriching learning experiences
- +High education level and experienced professors
- +Valuable new skills acquisition
- +Worthwhile academic decision
- +Personal student-teacher relationships and inclusive environment
- +Qualified and effective teaching leading to understanding
- +High-quality education, industry focus, and skill development
- +Experienced faculty and a challenging, enriching academic environment
- +Strong career prospects and alumni network
- +Excellent facilities and comfortable campus environment
- +Well-equipped labs and spacious library with good resources
- +Clean and well-maintained sports areas and student lounges
- +Rigorous academic challenge and supportive community
- +Character development and resilience building
- +Affordable tuition and high educational quality
- +Competent and supportive lecturers
- +Complete campus facilities and dynamic learning environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support for students' academic and personal needs is a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major drawback.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered, failing to engage students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and in need of repair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Inconsistent and unsupportive instruction detracts from the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are often cited as problems.
- -Course content and teaching quality can be inconsistent and disappointing.
The institution excels in several key areas, earning top marks for its facilities and student life, alongside a perfect score for internationality. Areas of strength include professors and accommodation, both receiving positive ratings. However, the university's weakest area is its value, indicated by a lower score in that category.
This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.
This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in the areas of Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a perfect score. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with high marks. The weakest area, Accommodation, received a satisfactory rating. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in Value with a rating of 4.33. Professors also received high marks at 4.22. Location and Internationality both achieved a solid 4. Areas for improvement seem to be Student Life, rated at 3.56, and Accommodations, with a score of 3.63, indicating these aspects are somewhat less developed compared to other strengths.
A mixed performance emerges from these university ratings, with notable strengths and significant weaknesses. The institution excels in its **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are areas of concern, each scoring a low 1. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 3, while the **Value** is rated a respectable 4, suggesting a generally positive return on investment despite specific drawbacks.
This institution garners excellent feedback, with exceptional scores of 5 out of 5 for Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Facilities, Professors, and Location are also rated highly at 4 out of 5. The strongest areas are clearly student experience and perceived value, while its core academic and infrastructural offerings are also robust.
Remarkably high scores characterize this university's overall evaluation. It excels in key areas such as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and perceived value, all receiving a perfect five stars. The university's internationality is also strong, though it is the lowest-rated category at four stars. This indicates a generally outstanding and well-rounded educational experience.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight significant personal growth, improved skills, and a broadened perspective as key benefits.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.
With an average rating of 5/5 from two reviews, students praise the personal education and welcoming environment fostered by close student-teacher relationships. They highlight qualified teachers and 100% understanding in teaching.
All 9 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.78/5. Students highly recommend the university for its fast-paced environment, experienced faculty, and industry-focused curriculum that prepares them for real-world challenges and job opportunities.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is praised for its excellent facilities and pleasant campus environment. Negative feedback is absent.
With one review and an average rating of 5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). The single review highlights a prestigious institution with excellent support and a unique campus life, fostering resilience and future readiness.
With a single review, this university receives an average rating of 5/5. The ~100% positive feedback highlights excellent educational quality, affordable tuition, competent and supportive lecturers, complete facilities, and a dynamic learning environment.
Learning design in the city of Florence is almost automatic, because the eyes watch captivating art, history and good taste in every corner, everyday. Studying a Master in Interior Design at F.I.D.I. was an experience that deeply enriched my life. In terms of space, the Institute is an excellent example of European Interior Design: well-conserved facade and frescoes of the 1700's on the ceilings and walls mix with new materials and pieces of contemporary furniture, creating a balanced, unique and intimate atmosphere. As I came from a very large university with many campuses in my country, F.I.D.I.'s attention to detail, neatness and personalization felt exquisite. Lessons were given in small groups, teachers are well prepared and actually enjoy what they are doing. From them I learned to observe closely, in order to start designing with quality, always respecting and appreciating the value of places and objects. Possibly the two things I would change are: 1) that teachers plan new projects for their new students to work. Florence has too many highlights and, as I keep in touch with the Institute at social media, I see that they are still making one of the projects that was asigned to my generation 7 years ago, and 2) that it lasted longer. Masters are usually longer to give students a steady formation.
I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate
Nothing to show
Our university was very good in teaching us the recent market trends and Market awareness so when we came out of the university it helped us to get into the job market . Also our seniors were very helpful in guiding us about the IT industry
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
