The Florence Institute of Design International - F.I.D.I. vs Istituto Marangoni vs Polimoda vs European School of Economics - ESE vs Accademia Italiana - AI
Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Immersive learning environment in a historically rich city
- +High-quality, well-designed facilities
- +Enriching personal and academic experience
- +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
- +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
- +Great faculty and beautiful location
- +Excellent student accommodation options
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- +Encouragement of creative exploration and personal expression in design
- +Faculty's one-to-one approach fosters critical thinking and broader perspectives
Nothing to show
- +Practical job-focused learning
- +International exchange opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor course quality are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of transparency and unfair practices are also major drawbacks.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
- -Administrative and communication issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Concerns exist regarding intellectual property rights for creative students.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as uninspiring or ineffective.
Across all surveyed categories, this university received a rating of 0. Consequently, there are no strongest or weakest areas to highlight, as performance was uniformly absent. The institution appears to lack any positive attributes in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.
This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key evaluation metrics. Its strongest suit lies in its location, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are its professors and value for money, both scoring a lower 2.5. Other aspects like facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality are rated a moderate 3.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its teaching staff and international student community, with professors receiving a rating of 4.33 and internationality scoring a solid 4. Student life and accommodation are rated a respectable 3.33, with location also performing well at 3.67. However, facilities represent a notable area for improvement, achieving the lowest score of 2.33. The overall value of the university is rated at 3.
Nothing to show
A nuanced performance is evident in these university ratings, with notable strengths in **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving a score of 4. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** stand out as weaker areas, each scoring a 2. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately at 3. Overall, the university excels in academic and global aspects, but faces challenges in its physical environment and student housing.
This university receives a high average rating of 4/5 stars. Positive feedback highlights enriching learning experiences and the unique environment. No negative reviews were recorded, representing approximately 0% of feedback.
With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly between positive and negative feedback. Positive comments highlight a good faculty and campus, while negative feedback points to management issues and withheld information.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 3/5, positive feedback (~67%) highlights engaging creative programs and faculty support. Negative feedback (~33%) points to administrative communication issues and concerns about intellectual property rights.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from 1 review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students appreciate learning practical skills and the university's international connections for study abroad opportunities.
Learning design in the city of Florence is almost automatic, because the eyes watch captivating art, history and good taste in every corner, everyday. Studying a Master in Interior Design at F.I.D.I. was an experience that deeply enriched my life. In terms of space, the Institute is an excellent example of European Interior Design: well-conserved facade and frescoes of the 1700's on the ceilings and walls mix with new materials and pieces of contemporary furniture, creating a balanced, unique and intimate atmosphere. As I came from a very large university with many campuses in my country, F.I.D.I.'s attention to detail, neatness and personalization felt exquisite. Lessons were given in small groups, teachers are well prepared and actually enjoy what they are doing. From them I learned to observe closely, in order to start designing with quality, always respecting and appreciating the value of places and objects. Possibly the two things I would change are: 1) that teachers plan new projects for their new students to work. Florence has too many highlights and, as I keep in touch with the Institute at social media, I see that they are still making one of the projects that was asigned to my generation 7 years ago, and 2) that it lasted longer. Masters are usually longer to give students a steady formation.
I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic
To anyone who is about to consider going to Polimoda, don’t. I was due to go there to pursue my Master’s in October 2020. However, it got postponed due to Covid, and I am glad it did. I realized that the management had withheld information from me about the course requirements. Plus, they had also started giving out 50% scholarships to those who were applying much later than I did, for the same course year. Besides withholding information and behaving erratically about money, the school’s management stopped responding to my concerns. I sent a request seeking to withdraw my admission and was met with no response. I reached out to the Italian Consulate to assist me, and upon their questioning, the management stated that they had always been in touch with me. They are unprofessional, unethical, and raise serious questions about the quality (and legitimacy) of the school.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
