Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora - ITSON vs Yalova University - YAU vs University of Bihać vs Bayero University, Kano - BUK vs Yogyakarta State University - UNY

Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora - ITSON: wins 0/0 categories
Yalova University - YAU: wins 0/0 categories
University of Bihać: wins 0/0 categories
Bayero University, Kano - BUK: wins 0/0 categories
Yogyakarta State University - UNY: wins 0/0 categories
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka - ICASL: wins 0/0 categories
RMIT Vietnam: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: MBA
Bihac, Bosnia and Herzegovina
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
4.60
Read more reviews
36 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Business
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
5.00
3.50
3.75
5.00
5.00
3.97
Location
5.00
3.00
5.00
4.04
5.00
5.00
4.00
Professors
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.12
5.00
5.00
4.67
Internationality
3.00
5.00
3.50
3.48
5.00
5.00
4.56
Student life
5.00
4.00
3.00
3.35
5.00
5.00
4.08
Value
4.00
5.00
3.50
4.24
5.00
5.00
4.69
Accommodation
5.00
2.00
3.50
3.33
Not rated
5.00
3.94
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent staff and well-maintained facilities
  • +Opportunities for positive social connections
  • +Evolving and updated academic programs
  • +Up-to-date systems and modern teaching methods.
  • +Challenging and engaging coursework.
  • +Excellent technical and professional programs
  • +Disappointing facilities for some faculties
  • +Academic excellence and well-rounded graduates
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Inspiring learning environment and diverse student population
  • +Practical, relevant curriculum
  • +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Focus on in-demand professional skills
  • +Highly reputable accounting and finance qualification
  • +Strong parliamentary backing and recognition
  • +International learning environment and multiculturalism
  • +Practical, interactive learning and career-oriented education
  • +Strong industry connections and internship opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and communication from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common point of dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is noted.
  • -Limited social and extracurricular activities.
  • -Academic stress and lack of fun.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Excessive administrative and bureaucratic processes.
  • -Poor quality instruction and lack of engaging teaching methods.
Rating summary
What students say

Across surveyed categories, this institution excels in several key areas. Its Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional student experience in these aspects. Professors and Value are also rated positively. The weakest area is Internationality, scoring a 3 out of 5, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement or diversity.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its Facilities and Internationality, both receiving perfect scores. The Value proposition also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, Accomodation is identified as a significant area for improvement, scoring the lowest. Professors, Student Life, and Location all fall within a solid mid-to-high range.

This institution scores exceptionally well in location, receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, student life presents the lowest-rated aspect at 3. Other areas like facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value are rated a solid 3.5, while professors are well-regarded with a 4-star average.

This institution receives strong commendations in several key areas, notably value at 4.24 and professors at 4.12. Location is also highly regarded. Conversely, student life and accommodation present as weaker points, with ratings of 3.35 and 3.33 respectively. Facilities and internationality fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential enhancement alongside its already robust strengths.

This institution garners exceptionally high ratings across the majority of surveyed categories, excelling particularly in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. The sole area requiring significant attention is Accomodation, which received a zero rating, indicating a substantial deficiency in this aspect.

Across all surveyed aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional performance. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently strong offering with no discernible weak areas. The university excels uniformly, providing an outstanding experience for its students.

Across various aspects of student experience, this university demonstrates notable strengths. It achieved particularly high marks in Value (4.69) and Professors (4.67), indicating strong academic and financial offerings. Internationality also scored well at 4.56. The weakest area identified is Facilities, with a rating of 3.97, though other categories like Student Life and Accomodation also fall within a similar range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, university student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Reviews highlight great facilities and staff, with some suggestions for program updates to better prepare students for the real world.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students appreciate the updated systems and challenging, modern teaching methods.

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. One review highlights strong faculty organization alongside notable issues with facilities at other departments.

~74% of reviews are positive, praising academic excellence and supportive lecturers. ~4% express concern about a heavy workload and limited practical infrastructure.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a well-structured curriculum and experienced lecturers offering practical, relevant learning. No negative feedback was provided.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. This single review highlights it as the best accounting and finance knowledge provider in Sri Lanka.

All 36 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.61/5. Students highlight interactive learning, international environments, practical skills development, and strong industry connections. There is no negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
50%
52%
100%
100%
61%
4★
50%
0%
0%
28%
0%
0%
39%
3★
0%
50%
50%
16%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reflection on my School experience

My school years were a mix of challenges and growth. The academics were strong, and many teachers were supportive, helping me develop key skills. Extracurriculars like sports and clubs made the experience fun and memorable. However, the workload was sometimes stressful, and I wish there had been more focus on mental health. A more flexible learning approach and better inclusivity policies could have improved the environment. Overall, it was a valuable experience, and I’m grateful for the lessons and friendships. With some improvements, it could be even better for future students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Big big big

If you read this, this is a signal for you to go to RMIT Mel. The school is so big lol. It will take 2 semesters to explore everything. Internet cafes, labs, exhibition areas, displays, virtual reality... Everything is there so go quickly. * food behind school is cheaper than outside. Near school there is fortune alleys which is also quite delicious

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close