EASD Escuela de Arte y Superior de Diseño Antonio Faílde vs Université d'Orléans vs Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University vs Odessa National Polytechnic University - ONPU vs Institut Supérieur de Communication - ISCOM
Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Diverse programs and experienced, friendly professors
- +Affordable tuition and living costs
- +Accessible campus and convenient facilities
- +Foundational science education
- +Excellent teaching and materials
- +Desire for modern teaching methods and staff
Nothing to show
- +Supportive, engaging lecturers and impactful teaching
- +Balance of academic rigor and vibrant campus life
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or uninspired.
- -Outdated curriculum and lack of willingness to improve it are major concerns.
- -Poor communication and disorganization from the university administration are frequent issues.
- -Facilities are often described as very old and in poor condition.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
- -Poor communication and lack of support leave students feeling neglected.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university shows particular strength in accommodation and internationality, both scoring a high 4.3. Other well-regarded areas include facilities, professors, and location, all at 3.8. Student life represents the weakest area with a score of 3.45, though the overall value remains solid at 3.7.
The university shows a mixed performance, excelling in location and value, both receiving 3.67. Student life is rated a solid 3. In contrast, internationality is the lowest-rated area at 2, with facilities and accommodation also scoring a low 2.33. Professors are rated moderately at 2.67.
Nothing to show
Across a comprehensive rating system, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. It achieves perfect scores for its professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The facilities and location also receive commendably high marks. Its weakest areas, while still strong, are the facilities and location, both scoring a 4 out of 5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from 17 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise diverse programs and reasonable fees, experienced and friendly professors, and affordable student living.
With a 2.67 average rating, roughly 33% of reviews are negative, citing outdated curriculum and teaching methods. One positive review highlights excellent fundamental science education but notes a lack of modern teaching approaches.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university is overwhelmingly praised. Students highlight fulfilling experiences, strong academic-life balance, and supportive, impactful lecturers. There are no negative reviews in this feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I found that the environment is very adaptable and super friendly The Master LAME courses were really interesting and sometimes challenging. However, the language courses promised was not what expected. I hoped for way more especially the french language. Its was definitely not sufficient for someone who is a beginner or intermediate. The other challenge was to get an internship in English..Not easy at all..at all.. Last but not least, the amazing international environment filled with wonderful people from all walks of life.. This definitely made the journey worthwhile.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show