Universidad de Puerto Rico - UPR vs Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos - ETSICCP vs The University of Oklahoma - OU vs Gitam University vs University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras

Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: NIT The Business School at the Hamburg University of Technology (5.00)
Universidad de Puerto Rico - UPR: wins 1/5 categories
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos - ETSICCP: wins 0/5 categories
The University of Oklahoma - OU: wins 0/5 categories
Gitam University: wins 0/5 categories
University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras: wins 1/5 categories
NIT The Business School at the Hamburg University of Technology: wins 3/5 categories
Centro Universitário Facol - FACOL: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico
4.60
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
4.70
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Hyderabad, India
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Best programme: Elementary Education
Best programme: MBA In Technology Management
Best programme: Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
4.00
4.38
4.33
3.50
4.80
Win
4.00
Location
4.88
4.00
3.60
4.33
5.00
4.60
5.00
Professors
4.56
4.00
4.50
4.33
5.00
5.00
4.00
Internationality
4.22
3.00
4.29
4.33
4.00
4.40
Win
2.00
Student life
4.44
3.00
4.46
4.33
5.00
Win
4.80
4.00
Value
4.44
Win
4.00
4.29
4.33
4.00
4.40
4.00
Accommodation
4.33
2.00
4.50
4.33
3.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse, high-quality academic programs and career opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and a strong sense of community and personal growth
  • +Open, inclusive, and professional campus environment
  • +High-quality, specialized engineering programs
  • +Diverse degree options and specializations
  • +Focus on specific, in-depth areas of study
  • +Engaging professors with real-world experience
  • +Welcoming campus atmosphere and facilities
  • +Diverse opportunities for student involvement and personal growth
  • +Industry exposure and career preparation
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Diverse course offerings and peaceful environment
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Well-prepared teaching staff and continuous training
  • +Excellent facilities and positive environment
  • +Integrated business and technology education for practical application.
  • +Small class sizes and personal lecturer/staff interaction.
  • +Strong focus on entrepreneurship and innovation.
  • +Excellent professors and good classes
  • +Valuable academic programs with new course additions
  • +Desire for more practical learning experiences
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and poor curriculum structure lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support causes frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This academic institution garners praise across multiple facets, with exceptional marks for **location** (4.88) and **professors** (4.56). Student life and overall value also receive strong scores around 4.44. The weakest area identified is **facilities**, rated at 3.5. Other positive aspects include accommodations and internationality, both scoring above 4.2.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **facilities, professors, location, and overall value**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well at 3. The primary area for improvement lies in **accommodation**, which received the lowest rating of 2. This suggests a university that excels in core academic and environmental factors but could enhance its student housing offerings.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Professors** and **Accommodation**, both earning a perfect 4.5 rating. **Student Life** also scores highly at 4.46. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3.6. Other areas, including **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, fall within the solid 4.2 to 4.3 range, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.

Across numerous aspects, this institution garners consistently high evaluations. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a near-perfect score of 4.33. Therefore, no single area stands out as significantly stronger or weaker than the others, suggesting a well-rounded and highly satisfactory university experience.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas, with perfect scores awarded for its professors, location, and student life. Internationality also receives a positive rating. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and accommodation, which are rated moderately well. Overall, the university offers strong value and excels in its academic and social offerings.

This institution garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Professors and accommodation stand out with perfect scores, indicating a highly valued academic staff and excellent housing options. Student life and facilities also received near-perfect marks, suggesting a vibrant campus environment and well-equipped resources. Conversely, internationality and value represent the weaker aspects, with ratings of 4.4, suggesting potential areas for enhancement in global engagement and affordability.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly excelling in its **Location**, earning a perfect score. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations all receive commendable ratings of 4, indicating solid performance in these key areas. However, a notable area for improvement lies in **Internationality**, which received a rating of 2. Overall, the university offers good value, reflected in its 4-star rating for that aspect.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.55/5. Students highlight excellent faculty, diverse programs, and a supportive environment for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars, indicating a predominantly positive sentiment. No negative feedback was received.

With a 4.71/5 average rating from 14 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise professors' real-world knowledge and engaging teaching, alongside campus facilities and affordability. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4.33/5 and 0% negative feedback, students praise the university for excellent module exposure, industry interactions, and knowledgeable professors who guide student interests. Positive feedback highlights good lab facilities and campus placement reputation.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 2 reviews, the university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight supportive and knowledgeable professors, along with excellent facilities and a positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.

All 6 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students highlight the strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, practical learning, and a welcoming atmosphere. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, student feedback is highly positive (~100%). The reviewer highlighted excellent professors and good classes, with a minor suggestion for more practical studies.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
0%
71%
33%
50%
100%
0%
4★
50%
100%
29%
67%
50%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Best Varsity

This was the best Varsity ever. The professionalism is on the high level. I have no dislikes and I highly recommend it to people who are struggling with focus. It's takes special students with disabilities.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close