SRM University vs Prist University vs SASTRA Deemed University vs Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies - VISTAS vs Manonmaniam Sundaranar University

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: SRM University (4.30)
SRM University: wins 0/6 categories
Prist University: wins 0/6 categories
SASTRA Deemed University: wins 0/6 categories
Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies - VISTAS: wins 0/6 categories
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University: wins 5/6 categories
Thiruvalluvar University: wins 1/6 categories
St.Peter's College of Engineering and Technology - SPCET: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Chennai, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Physics
Best programme: Psychology (Developmental and Educational)
Category ratings
Facilities
3.88
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
2.00
Location
3.47
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
Professors
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
1.00
Student life
3.93
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Value
3.88
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.81
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and helpful, experienced professors.
  • +Excellent exposure through diverse programs and industry-aligned curriculum.
  • +Strong focus on placements and practical learning experiences.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
  • +Well-equipped labs and effective curriculum
  • +Enjoyable campus life
  • +Kind and approachable professors
  • +Good study environment
  • +Well-designed marketing and business programmes

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Biased faculty and unfair grading practices.
  • -Poor campus life and lack of support for genuine talent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves strong performance, particularly in Student Life, with a rating of 3.93. Facilities and Value also score highly at 3.875. The university's Location, however, received the lowest rating at 3.47, alongside Professors and Internationality which both scored 3.5. Accommodations also received a solid rating of 3.81.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives near-perfect scores across the board, reflecting outstanding performance in its facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all scoring a perfect five. While still strong, the university's internationality and value received slightly lower, though still excellent, ratings of four.

This institution demonstrates strong internationality, receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Key areas like facilities, professors, and student life are also well-regarded with 4-star ratings. However, the university's location and accommodation received a more moderate score of 3 stars, suggesting these aspects could be areas for development. Overall value is rated positively at 4 stars.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are predominantly positive, with an average rating of 4.34/5. Students praise the quality of education, helpful faculty, and good environment. A small portion (~3%) expressed concerns about campus life and faculty bias.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, the single review highlights positive curriculum coverage, supportive staff, and good labs. Infrastructure and syllabus advancement are areas noted for improvement, representing ~0% negative feedback.

The single review is positive, rating the university 4/5. It praises kind professors but notes concerns about litter and difficult travel due to location.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
56%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
28%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
3★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close