SRM University vs Loyola College vs Ethiraj College for Women vs Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies - VISTAS vs Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering - SVCE

Side-by-side comparison from 52 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
SRM University: wins 0/4 categories
Loyola College: wins 1/4 categories
Ethiraj College for Women: wins 0/4 categories
Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies - VISTAS: wins 0/4 categories
Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering - SVCE: wins 3/4 categories
Thiruvalluvar University: wins 0/4 categories
St.Peter's College of Engineering and Technology - SPCET: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.30
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Chennai, India
4.50
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Best programme: Psychology (Developmental and Educational)
Category ratings
Facilities
3.88
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
2.00
Location
3.47
4.57
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.00
3.00
3.00
Professors
3.50
4.60
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.50
4.13
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
1.00
Student life
3.93
4.33
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
3.00
Value
3.88
4.13
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.81
3.47
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and helpful, experienced professors.
  • +Excellent exposure through diverse programs and industry-aligned curriculum.
  • +Strong focus on placements and practical learning experiences.
  • +Versatile and specialized programs
  • +Encouraging and supportive faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and campus environment
  • +Inspiring and supportive atmosphere with invested faculty and administration.
  • +Empowerment and exposure leading to confidence and vision.
  • +Equal encouragement of academics, sports, and cultural activities.

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent infrastructure and campus environment
  • +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Kind and approachable professors
  • +Good study environment
  • +Well-designed marketing and business programmes

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Biased faculty and unfair grading practices.
  • -Poor campus life and lack of support for genuine talent.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
  • -Limited career support and networking opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from staff are consistently mentioned.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support impact the learning experience.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves strong performance, particularly in Student Life, with a rating of 3.93. Facilities and Value also score highly at 3.875. The university's Location, however, received the lowest rating at 3.47, alongside Professors and Internationality which both scored 3.5. Accommodations also received a solid rating of 3.81.

This institution receives high marks for its professors and location, with ratings of 4.6 and approximately 4.57 respectively. Student life and internationality also score well, both around 4.13. Facilities are rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is accommodation, which scores 3.47, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

This institution scores exceptionally well in key areas such as **student life and professors**, both receiving a perfect 5. Its location and overall value are also highly regarded at 4.5. Conversely, accommodation stands out as its weakest point, with a rating of 3. Facilities and internationality are rated solidly at 4.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates outstanding performance across nearly all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional strengths in these core areas. The location is the sole aspect rated slightly lower at a still respectable 4.

This institution demonstrates strong internationality, receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Key areas like facilities, professors, and student life are also well-regarded with 4-star ratings. However, the university's location and accommodation received a more moderate score of 3 stars, suggesting these aspects could be areas for development. Overall value is rated positively at 4 stars.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are predominantly positive, with an average rating of 4.34/5. Students praise the quality of education, helpful faculty, and good environment. A small portion (~3%) expressed concerns about campus life and faculty bias.

Students highly praise the university, with ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.47/5. Recurring themes include excellent professors, varied courses, and a beautiful campus with ample facilities. Accommodation costs are noted as expensive.

With an average rating of 5/5, these reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight an inspiring and supportive atmosphere, with faculty and administration invested in their journeys. They also praise cultural festivals and a sense of empowerment and vision.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong academics, vibrant campus life, and growth opportunities. The campus is described as beautiful and spacious with modern facilities.

The single review is positive, rating the university 4/5. It praises kind professors but notes concerns about litter and difficult travel due to location.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
56%
53%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
28%
40%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
13%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close