SRM University vs BJB College Bhubaneswar vs Loyola College vs Prist University vs WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN COLLEGE

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
SRM University: wins 0/3 categories
BJB College Bhubaneswar: wins 0/3 categories
Loyola College: wins 0/3 categories
Prist University: wins 0/3 categories
WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: wins 1/3 categories
Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS: wins 0/3 categories
Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering - SVCE: wins 2/3 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.30
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Chennai, India
4.50
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Chennai, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Visual Communication Design
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.88
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
3.47
Not rated
4.57
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Professors
3.50
Not rated
4.60
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
4.13
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
3.93
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
3.88
Not rated
4.13
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.81
Not rated
3.47
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and helpful, experienced professors.
  • +Excellent exposure through diverse programs and industry-aligned curriculum.
  • +Strong focus on placements and practical learning experiences.

Nothing to show

  • +Versatile and specialized programs
  • +Encouraging and supportive faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Strong campus culture and student involvement
  • +Good brand recognition

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent infrastructure and campus environment
  • +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
Cons
  • -Biased faculty and unfair grading practices.
  • -Poor campus life and lack of support for genuine talent.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
  • -Limited career support and networking opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resource availability are major drawbacks.
  • -Instruction quality and course relevance are frequently criticized.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support impact the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves strong performance, particularly in Student Life, with a rating of 3.93. Facilities and Value also score highly at 3.875. The university's Location, however, received the lowest rating at 3.47, alongside Professors and Internationality which both scored 3.5. Accommodations also received a solid rating of 3.81.

Nothing to show

This institution receives high marks for its professors and location, with ratings of 4.6 and approximately 4.57 respectively. Student life and internationality also score well, both around 4.13. Facilities are rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is accommodation, which scores 3.47, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding scores in several key areas, notably its facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all earning a perfect 5 out of 5. Areas for potential improvement lie in internationality and value, which are rated a solid 4 out of 5, indicating good but not exceptional standing.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates outstanding performance across nearly all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional strengths in these core areas. The location is the sole aspect rated slightly lower at a still respectable 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are predominantly positive, with an average rating of 4.34/5. Students praise the quality of education, helpful faculty, and good environment. A small portion (~3%) expressed concerns about campus life and faculty bias.

Nothing to show

Students highly praise the university, with ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.47/5. Recurring themes include excellent professors, varied courses, and a beautiful campus with ample facilities. Accommodation costs are noted as expensive.

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100%), with students highlighting campus life and brand recognition. There is no negative feedback provided.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong academics, vibrant campus life, and growth opportunities. The campus is described as beautiful and spacious with modern facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
56%
0%
53%
0%
100%
0%
100%
4★
28%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
13%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close