University of Carthage - UCAR vs Tunis Business School - TBS vs Esprit school of business vs Misr University for Science and Technology vs South Mediterranean University - Smu

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Esprit school of business (5.00)
University of Carthage - UCAR: wins 0/7 categories
Tunis Business School - TBS: wins 0/7 categories
Esprit school of business: wins 3/7 categories
Misr University for Science and Technology: wins 2/7 categories
South Mediterranean University - Smu: wins 2/7 categories
Manouba University: wins 0/7 categories
Higher Institute of Technological Studies of Rades - ISET RADES: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Computer Information Systems
Best programme: Bachelor Business
Tunis, Tunisia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
1.50
3.50
4.00
4.00
4.22
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
2.00
4.00
3.50
4.14
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.50
3.00
4.33
4.50
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.50
3.63
4.67
Win
4.00
3.78
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.00
4.25
4.67
Win
4.50
4.13
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.00
4.00
4.67
Win
4.00
4.56
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
1.00
2.88
3.67
4.00
Win
3.14
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and effective teaching methods
  • +Supportive and accessible instructors
  • +Practical, real-world focused curriculum
  • +Comprehensive education system with practical exercises and diverse subject options.
  • +Focus on developing future leaders with strong soft skills and entrepreneurship.
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment offering numerous opportunities and career guidance.
  • +Innovative and relevant curriculum
  • +Welcoming and good staff
  • +Strong business and engineering programs
  • +Supportive and understanding professors
  • +Innovative learning environment and future-ready skills
  • +Modern facilities and effective teaching methods
  • +Comprehensive programs with technical and business skills
  • +Supportive and approachable professors
  • +Vibrant campus life and personal growth opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Uncooperative staff
  • -Discouraging reliance on the institution
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a major problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a major drawback.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance based on student feedback. The **strongest areas** are Location (4) and Professors (3.5), suggesting a positive experience with campus surroundings and academic staff. Conversely, Accomodation (1) and Facilities (1.5) are identified as the **weakest points**, indicating significant room for improvement in these crucial aspects of campus living. Student Life and Internationality received moderate scores, while Value sits at a lower end.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in student life and value for money, both receiving high scores. Conversely, location and accommodation present the most significant areas for improvement, with lower ratings. Facilities and internationality also score moderately well, while the professor rating falls slightly below average.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, internationality, and value, all receiving scores around 4.67. Professors are also highly rated at 4.33. Facilities and location are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, with a score of 3.67.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff and vibrant student life, both earning a high 4.5 rating. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4, as does its international appeal and overall value. The university's location receives the lowest mark at 3.5, representing its primary area for potential improvement.

This institution scores particularly well for **Value** (4.56), followed closely by **Professors** (4.33) and **Facilities** (4.22). Areas receiving more moderate assessments include **Location** (4.14), **Student Life** (4.13), and **Internationality** (3.78). The lowest-rated aspect is **Accomodation**, scoring 3.14.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 2.5/5 from two reviews, 50% of feedback was negative. Students cited unorganized administration and uncooperative staff as concerns.

Students praise comprehensive training, attentive teaching, and an enriching educational system with a focus on leadership and soft skills. The university offers a variety of subjects, extracurricular activities, and career opportunities, creating a positive atmosphere. No negative feedback was provided.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight innovative content, practical projects, and welcoming staff.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 2 positive reviews highlight faculty support and innovative programs. No negative reviews were submitted.

All 9 reviews are positive, averaging 4.67/5. Students highlight a well-rounded curriculum with both technical and non-technical courses, vibrant campus life, and supportive professors. There is no negative feedback in this sample.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
25%
100%
50%
67%
0%
0%
4★
0%
50%
0%
50%
33%
0%
0%
3★
50%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close