Universidad Loyola Andalucía vs Ural State University of Economics vs National Sun Yat-sen University - NSYSU vs TIAS School for Business and Society vs Escuela Superior de Cine y Audiovisuales de Cataluña - ESCAC
Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Small class sizes and interactive professors
- +Interesting and modern curriculum with practical applications
- +Flexible scheduling and supportive campus environment
- +excellent teaching and knowledge acquisition
- +strong community and lasting friendships
- +good quality of training, even on a commercial basis
- +Supportive environment for language and cultural immersion
- +Accessible international programs taught in English
- +Democratic atmosphere for cultural exploration
- +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
- +Engaging professors and insightful discussions
- +Engaging and passionate faculty and visiting lecturers
- +Electric energy and inspiring community
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +High quality education and professors
- +Excellent campus environment and facilities
- +Global partnerships and industry connections
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a problem.
- -A lack of resources and support hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Lack of student support and resources.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Ineffective communication and bureaucratic administrative processes.
- -Lack of engaging and up-to-date curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Professors are highly rated at 4.67, with student life, internationality, and value also scoring well at 4.33. The university also fares well in facilities and location, both rated at 4. However, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, receiving a low rating of 2.
This institution presents a uniformly neutral performance across all evaluated aspects. No single area stands out as particularly strong or weak, with facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all receiving identical, middle-ground scores. The ratings suggest a consistent, if unremarkable, experience for students in every surveyed domain.
Overall, this university received consistently low ratings across all surveyed aspects, with no areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Scores of zero were recorded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This suggests significant room for improvement in every facet of the university experience.
Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.
Across various aspects, this university demonstrates notable strengths in **professors, location, student life, and internationality**, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as a weaker area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Facilities and overall value received moderate ratings of 3.5.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
This university achieves a strong overall rating, with particularly high marks for its **Facilities** (4.67) and excellent scores in **Student Life** (4.33), **Accomodation** (4.56), **Internationality** (4.56), and **Value** (4.56). **Professors** also received a commendable rating (4.33). The **Location** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect at 3.78.
University reviews are highly positive, with ~100% of feedback being favorable. Students praise flexible schedules, interesting research and content, and small, interactive classes. Professors are noted as passionate and highly trained, fostering a comfortable and supportive atmosphere.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on two reviews, students express strong positive sentiment. Recurring themes include excellent teaching quality and valuable educational experiences. Approximately 0% of feedback was negative.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the feedback highlights a great environment for learning Chinese, including native speakers and cultural exploration. Programs taught in English are also a positive aspect for international students.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%). Reviews highlight engaging teachers and an electric atmosphere. No negative reviews were received.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~89%). Students praise the high quality of education, strong academic programs, excellent campus facilities, and valuable global partnerships. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
