Universidad Marítima del Caribe - UMC vs Gomal University vs Jember University vs Uttranchal University vs Bern University of Applied Sciences - BFH

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Instituto Federal Fluminense (5.00)
Universidad Marítima del Caribe - UMC: wins 0/0 categories
Gomal University: wins 0/0 categories
Jember University: wins 0/0 categories
Uttranchal University: wins 0/0 categories
Bern University of Applied Sciences - BFH: wins 0/0 categories
Instituto Federal Fluminense: wins 0/0 categories
Eschosys Bhifmet: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
dera ismail khan, Pakistan
3.80
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Telecommunication Systems
jember, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Uttarakhand, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Physical Education
Yaounde, Cameroon
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.22
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.30
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.56
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.78
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.44
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.11
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Specialized maritime engineering program
  • +Exceptional teaching quality and supportive, knowledgeable staff
  • +Enhanced communication and language skills development
  • +Positive and friendly learning environment fostering personal growth
  • +Generous and kind teachers
  • +Good facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +New facilities and resources
  • +Enjoyable learning experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of administrative support and unclear management communication cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Inconsistent or ineffective teaching methods and curriculum delivery are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Disorganized student bodies & frequent campus closures
  • -Lack of proper classes & curriculum adherence
  • -Lack of adequate support, administrative issues, and poor communication are common frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and a curriculum that doesn't meet modern demands are significant drawbacks.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniformly neutral profile across all evaluated aspects. Areas of strength and weakness are not discernible, as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received identical scores. The assessment indicates no particular standout features or significant shortcomings.

Student life stands out as a particularly strong point, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area. Other categories, including facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value, received moderately positive scores, suggesting a well-rounded, though not uniformly exceptional, university experience.

Exceptional marks were awarded across most aspects of the university. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation all received a perfect score of 5, indicating outstanding performance in these core areas. The university also scores highly for value, also earning a 5. The only slight dip in ratings was for internationality, which received a respectable 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength across key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value. The university also boasts a strong international presence, indicated by its high rating in that category. While overall performance is outstanding, a slightly lower score in internationality suggests this is an area with room for further enhancement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university receives a 4/5 average rating, with ~100% of feedback being positive. The positive sentiment highlights a selective range of careers, specifically mentioning Maritime Engineering as a strong program.

University reviews are largely positive (~74% of feedback), praising effective education and staff support. About 11% of feedback noted concerns about management and curriculum adherence.

The single review is positive, with a 4/5 average rating. This feedback highlights generous teachers and good facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has received overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights a positive learning experience, particularly with newly established courses and facilities.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
100%
33%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close