VIA University College - VIA vs Plekhanov Russian University of Economics vs Ecological University of Bucharest - UEB vs Wayne State University - WSU vs Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Side-by-side comparison from 127 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur (5.00)
VIA University College - VIA: wins 0/3 categories
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics: wins 0/3 categories
Ecological University of Bucharest - UEB: wins 0/3 categories
Wayne State University - WSU: wins 0/3 categories
Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur: wins 3/3 categories
Centro Universitario Tecnológico - CEUTEC: wins 0/3 categories
Bandarban University: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Management
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Environmental Civil Engineering
Best programme: Psychology
Bandarban, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.88
5.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
3.90
5.00
3.33
Not rated
5.00
4.50
Not rated
Professors
4.44
3.67
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
4.92
3.67
3.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.50
Not rated
Student life
3.84
5.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
3.50
Not rated
Value
4.24
4.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.86
3.67
5.00
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world focused education
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Organized learning environment and resources
  • +Strong marketing and management programs
  • +International opportunities and faculty support
  • +Active student life and modern facilities
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Focus on environmental awareness and commitment
  • +Positive overall student experience

Nothing to show

  • +Prestigious technological research institute status
  • +Wide range of academic programs and degrees
  • +Consistent top engineering institution rankings
  • +Flexible and accessible hybrid learning models
  • +Revolutionary educational approach for working adults
  • +Availability of night classes

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including inconsistent teaching quality and lack of student attention.
  • -Outdated facilities and course material requiring reorganization.
  • -Lack of feedback on exams and unclear grading policies.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often unsatisfactory.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency are persistent problems.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor communication.
  • -They are frustrated by outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources.
  • -Students feel unsupported by inadequate teaching and academic advising.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary equipment are significant concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, cause frustration.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as outdated, with insufficient practical application and limited focus on relevant skills.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Exhibiting exceptional strengths in Internationality (4.92) and Facilities (4.88), this institution receives very high marks in these areas. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.44. Conversely, Student Life (3.84) and Location (3.9) represent the weaker aspects of the university experience, though accommodations (3.86) are only slightly above this. Value is rated a solid 4.24.

Boasting excellent scores, the university excels in its facilities, location, and student life, all receiving a perfect five stars. However, areas for improvement are evident in professors, accommodation, and internationality, which all received a rating of approximately 3.67. Value is rated a solid four stars, indicating a generally positive perception of the institution.

This university garners exceptional ratings for its Accomodation, scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with high marks of 4.67. Conversely, Location and Internationality are areas that received lower scores, both at 3.33. Professors and Value are rated well, at 4.33, indicating a generally positive experience with academics and affordability.

Nothing to show

With perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received top marks, indicating a consistently outstanding experience for students. No specific weakest areas are identified, as all aspects of the university appear to be performing at their absolute best according to these ratings.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment, with **Professors** and **Location** both receiving a high **4.5** rating. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at **4**. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, scoring a **3**, alongside **Student Life** and **Internationality**, which are rated at **3.5**. The overall **Value** is considered good at **4**.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.08 average rating from 119 reviews, ~74% are positive, praising organized schedules, helpful teachers, and practical learning. Negative feedback is minimal (~4.2%) and briefly mentions program variability and limited student attention.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the program's deep knowledge, international opportunities, and attentive faculty, alongside an active student life. Some mention intense workload and occasional issues with subject sequencing.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight helpful faculty and a positive learning environment.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The sole review highlights its prestige and diverse research opportunities.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the modern facilities and revolutionary hybrid learning model, highlighting its accessibility and flexibility for working professionals.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
33%
67%
0%
100%
50%
0%
4★
48%
67%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
15%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Marketing Management Student

I believe VIA UC gives really good opportunities to develop within a specific field. I can talk from my experience being a Marketing Management student. The study model is comprehensive with internship possibilities to gain practical knowledge about the subject. I enjoy learning environment as well as lecturers, who can be successful entrepreneurs/experts in their field. The focus is based on group work as well as problem-solving cases. Campus Horsens offers a wide range of places to study, library, gym, and several organisations as AIESEC or student council DSR, that offer extracurricular opportunities. The attached Vitus Bering Innovation Park gives an insight into a business environment which encourages students to participate in innovative challenges or offers support with developing own businesses.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close