VIA University College - VIA vs Plekhanov Russian University of Economics vs Ecological University of Bucharest - UEB vs Wayne State University - WSU vs Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
Side-by-side comparison from 127 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, real-world focused education
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Organized learning environment and resources
- +Strong marketing and management programs
- +International opportunities and faculty support
- +Active student life and modern facilities
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Focus on environmental awareness and commitment
- +Positive overall student experience
Nothing to show
- +Prestigious technological research institute status
- +Wide range of academic programs and degrees
- +Consistent top engineering institution rankings
- +Flexible and accessible hybrid learning models
- +Revolutionary educational approach for working adults
- +Availability of night classes
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including inconsistent teaching quality and lack of student attention.
- -Outdated facilities and course material requiring reorganization.
- -Lack of feedback on exams and unclear grading policies.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often unsatisfactory.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency are persistent problems.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor communication.
- -They are frustrated by outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources.
- -Students feel unsupported by inadequate teaching and academic advising.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary equipment are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, cause frustration.
- -The curriculum is perceived as outdated, with insufficient practical application and limited focus on relevant skills.
Nothing to show
Exhibiting exceptional strengths in Internationality (4.92) and Facilities (4.88), this institution receives very high marks in these areas. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.44. Conversely, Student Life (3.84) and Location (3.9) represent the weaker aspects of the university experience, though accommodations (3.86) are only slightly above this. Value is rated a solid 4.24.
Boasting excellent scores, the university excels in its facilities, location, and student life, all receiving a perfect five stars. However, areas for improvement are evident in professors, accommodation, and internationality, which all received a rating of approximately 3.67. Value is rated a solid four stars, indicating a generally positive perception of the institution.
This university garners exceptional ratings for its Accomodation, scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with high marks of 4.67. Conversely, Location and Internationality are areas that received lower scores, both at 3.33. Professors and Value are rated well, at 4.33, indicating a generally positive experience with academics and affordability.
Nothing to show
With perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received top marks, indicating a consistently outstanding experience for students. No specific weakest areas are identified, as all aspects of the university appear to be performing at their absolute best according to these ratings.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment, with **Professors** and **Location** both receiving a high **4.5** rating. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at **4**. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, scoring a **3**, alongside **Student Life** and **Internationality**, which are rated at **3.5**. The overall **Value** is considered good at **4**.
Nothing to show
With a 4.08 average rating from 119 reviews, ~74% are positive, praising organized schedules, helpful teachers, and practical learning. Negative feedback is minimal (~4.2%) and briefly mentions program variability and limited student attention.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the program's deep knowledge, international opportunities, and attentive faculty, alongside an active student life. Some mention intense workload and occasional issues with subject sequencing.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight helpful faculty and a positive learning environment.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The sole review highlights its prestige and diverse research opportunities.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the modern facilities and revolutionary hybrid learning model, highlighting its accessibility and flexibility for working professionals.
Nothing to show
I believe VIA UC gives really good opportunities to develop within a specific field. I can talk from my experience being a Marketing Management student. The study model is comprehensive with internship possibilities to gain practical knowledge about the subject. I enjoy learning environment as well as lecturers, who can be successful entrepreneurs/experts in their field. The focus is based on group work as well as problem-solving cases. Campus Horsens offers a wide range of places to study, library, gym, and several organisations as AIESEC or student council DSR, that offer extracurricular opportunities. The attached Vitus Bering Innovation Park gives an insight into a business environment which encourages students to participate in innovative challenges or offers support with developing own businesses.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show