Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC vs National Chiao Tung University vs Staatliche Berufsschule Bad Wörishofen - BSMN vs Kabarak University - KABU vs UNIFEB - UNIFEB

Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National Chiao Tung University (5.00)
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 1/7 categories
National Chiao Tung University: wins 4/7 categories
Staatliche Berufsschule Bad Wörishofen - BSMN: wins 0/7 categories
Kabarak University - KABU: wins 1/7 categories
UNIFEB - UNIFEB: wins 0/7 categories
Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI: wins 1/7 categories
African Institute of Research and Development Studies - AIRADS College : wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Adult Nursing
Barretos, Brazil
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.41
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.46
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.63
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.66
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
3.88
4.00
Not rated
4.17
Win
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Value
4.63
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.76
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.44
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment
  • +Diverse student body and collaborative learning opportunities.
  • +Merged programs offering strong technological and medical expertise.

Nothing to show

  • +Academic excellence and holistic growth
  • +Supportive and dedicated faculty
  • +Positive and spiritual learning environment

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse range of programs and majors
  • +Good course material and practical applications

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is prevalent.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Lack of adequate administrative support and unclear communication frustrate students.
  • -Course quality, including curriculum and teaching methods, often falls short of expectations.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

With outstanding scores in facilities, professors, and accommodation, this institution excels in core academic and living provisions. Student life and internationality are also highly rated, indicating a well-rounded experience. The location receives a good, though not perfect, score, representing the only slight area for potential improvement amidst otherwise excellent feedback. Overall, the university offers substantial value.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in several areas, notably achieving its highest score for **Value** (4.76). **Professors** also received a very high rating (4.66). Areas like **Facilities** (4.41), **Location** (4.46), and **Accomodation** (4.44) are well-regarded. **Student Life** (4.25) and **Internationality** (4.17) are the comparatively lower, though still positive, scores.

Nothing to show

Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the diverse student composition and valuable learning opportunities, appreciating the combined strengths of the merged universities.

Nothing to show

With a high average rating of 4.69/5, ~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, spiritual growth, and a conducive learning environment. Some suggest improvements for specific courses and occasional administrative delays.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
56%
100%
0%
72%
0%
33%
0%
4★
44%
0%
0%
24%
0%
67%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close