Universidad Rural de Guatemala - URURAL vs Burman University vs Dar Al Hekma University vs Nueva Vizcaya State University - NVSU vs Mulawarman University - UNMUL

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Cardinal Stefan - UKSW (4.80)
Universidad Rural de Guatemala - URURAL: wins 0/6 categories
Burman University: wins 0/6 categories
Dar Al Hekma University: wins 0/6 categories
Nueva Vizcaya State University - NVSU: wins 2/6 categories
Mulawarman University - UNMUL : wins 0/6 categories
University of Cardinal Stefan - UKSW: wins 1/6 categories
S K Somaiya College of Arts Science and Commerce: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Lacombe, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: English Teaching
Best programme: Archaeology
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
2.50
4.75
5.00
Win
Location
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.50
4.50
5.00
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.50
5.00
Win
3.50
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
3.75
4.00
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.50
4.50
5.00
Win
Value
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
4.75
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.50
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Nurturing community and personal growth
  • +Rich and diverse academic offerings
  • +Welcoming campus environment and extensive course options
  • +Strong career prospects post-graduation
  • +High academic standards with supportive and competent professors.
  • +Friendly and welcoming atmosphere fostering community.
  • +Engaging and practical teaching methods enhancing learning.
  • +Diverse course options and activities
  • +Extensive campus facilities
Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are inconsistent and often disappointing.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disappointing.
  • -Ineffective or unresponsive administration and management cause frequent frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization leads to confusion and inconvenience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of academic support and resources hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels particularly in its **location** and **internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. **Value** is also a significant strength, rated at the highest level. The university also demonstrates strong performance in **professors** and **student life**. However, its **facilities** and **accommodation** are areas that received comparatively lower, though still solid, ratings.

Offering a mixed bag of strengths and weaknesses, this institution shines brightest in its **location**, receiving a near-perfect score. Conversely, **facilities** represent its most significant area for improvement, with a notably lower rating. The university also scores moderately well in its professor quality, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly for its professors and value, both receiving perfect or near-perfect scores. Facilities and student life also stand out positively. The university's weakest area appears to be internationality, with a comparatively lower rating. Accommodations also received a solid, though not top-tier, assessment.

This university garners excellent marks in several key areas. Its facilities and student life are rated a perfect 5, with location also receiving top marks. Accommodation scores highly at 4.5. While internationality is strong at 4, professors represent the weakest area with a 3.5 rating. Overall value is considered good at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4/5 stars. This feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting transformative academic and personal growth within a vibrant community.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is largely positive (~100%). Students praise the university's conducive environment and diverse academic programs. No negative feedback was received.

All 4 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students highlight a friendly atmosphere, competent and supportive academic staff, high academic standards, and engaging classes. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students appreciate the variety of courses and extensive campus facilities, including sports courts. No negative reviews were recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
75%
50%
4★
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
25%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
50%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close