Near East University - NEU vs Girne American University - GAU vs Cyprus International Institute of Management vs UCLan Cyprus vs European University Cyprus
Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse and multicultural student body
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and engaging teaching methods
- +Modern campus with extensive facilities and amenities
- +Supportive and guiding teachers
- +Encouraging and inspiring environment
- +Excellent resources and student life support
Nothing to show
- +Practical, real-world learning and industry focus
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers
- +High-quality, relevant curriculum and modern technologies
Nothing to show
- +Strong professional experience and helpful professors
- +Diverse international student community
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Facilities, including classrooms and dormitories, are insufficient and neglected.
- -Teaching methods and the quality of some academic staff are poor.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as uninspired and disconnected from real-world applications.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Overcrowding and large class sizes negatively impact the learning experience.
Nothing to show
- -Unfair and suspicious grading system, particularly regarding thesis evaluation.
- -Lack of transparency and truthfulness in communication from the university and supervisors.
Nothing to show
This institution's internationality and professors received the highest marks, both scoring above 3.6. Facilities and value also garnered favorable reviews, around 3.5 and 3.3 respectively. However, student life, accommodation, and location were areas that received lower ratings, with accommodation being the weakest point. Overall, the university shows strengths in its global connections and academic staff, though improvements could be considered in campus life and housing.
This institution receives its highest marks for the quality of its professors, followed closely by its internationality and location. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with the lowest rating. Facilities and student life also received middling scores, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
Nothing to show
Performance varies across this university's assessed areas. Professors and Value are its strongest points, both receiving high marks. Conversely, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality present the weakest aspects, with considerably lower scores. Facilities fall in the middle of these extremes.
Nothing to show
With a solid overall performance, this institution excels in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received high marks, indicating a positive campus environment and convenient surroundings. However, the university's strongest areas are contrasted by lower scores for professors and internationality, suggesting potential room for improvement in academic support and global engagement. The value also appears to be a weaker point.
Nothing to show
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good education, diverse student body, and amazing campus facilities. ~26% of feedback is negative, with some mentioning poor management and administrative issues.
About 70% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teaching staff and a good learning environment. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
Students rate their university experience highly, with a ~100% positive sentiment. Recurring themes praise practical learning, approachable lecturers, and relevant course content. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 2/5, negative feedback (~67%) dominates. Students express dissatisfaction with the grading system, citing unfairness and suspicion. One positive comment highlights valuable professional experience and helpful professors.
Nothing to show
Near East University is one of the oldest university located in North Cyrpus. The campus is in Nicosia and in the city centre. There are many faculties addressing to all kind of students. As Cyprus is a safe and easy country with regulations, many students from different countries prefer to study here. Almost 80 different nationality exists in university. Especially for social sciences, NEU gets high demand. For career, university is trying to compete with other worldwide universities. As a student do not have high expectations but you can easily receive a diploma to graduate from university.
A renounced and progressive university that offers student with the best education and goes beyond and over to help students achieve excellence in their respective departments. An environment that supports and encourages student to strive .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I had the worst possible experience during my diploma thesis grading, plus the overall grading system works in a very suspicious way and is totally unfair. My 1st degree is from an Engineering university (5years - integrated master) thus I had high expectations which were proven to be false. Throughout the thesis process, I was repeatedly assured that everything was progressing well. My supervisor gave me the impression that my work met all expectations and that my performance was strong. However, I was surprised and disheartened to receive a final thesis grade of 8/10, which was significantly lower than my average course grades, typically around 9/10. This discrepancy brought down my final degree average to 8.6, which does not reflect the overall quality and consistency of my academic performance. In higher level universities, you are supposed to get your best grade in your best project, which is your thesis, but not on Neapolis Pafos University apparently. Regarding my work, please note that even at my presentation everyone was thrilled about my work (I also answered every question with great success as they mentioned). All 3 supervisors congratulated me and then gave me an 8. I wanted some feedback, and I tried to call my supervisor but he rejected every single one of my calls!! Hilarious. The lack of alignment between the supervisor’s feedback and the final grade raises concerns about fairness and consistency in the grading system.
Nothing to show
