Polish Japanese Academy of Information Technology - PJATK vs Redeemer University College vs Damascus University - DU vs Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology - HIAST vs Lusaka Apex Medical University - LAMU

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Polish Japanese Academy of Information Technology - PJATK: wins 1/3 categories
Redeemer University College: wins 0/3 categories
Damascus University - DU: wins 0/3 categories
Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology - HIAST: wins 1/3 categories
Lusaka Apex Medical University - LAMU: wins 0/3 categories
Skyhigh University: wins 0/3 categories
Syrian Virtual University: wins 1/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Information Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Pharmacy
Best programme: Telecommunications Engineering
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Douala, Cameroon
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Not rated
3.67
4.00
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.67
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
4.67
Professors
4.33
Not rated
4.33
4.00
4.25
Not rated
3.67
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
3.67
Student life
4.00
Not rated
3.33
5.00
5.00
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.83
3.00
4.50
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
3.67
Not rated
3.50
4.00
3.50
Not rated
4.33
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and industry-focused programs
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment
  • +Excellent and dedicated faculty

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and dedicated faculty
  • +Modern learning environment and updated materials
  • +Opportunities for student growth and development
  • +Prestigious, rigorous applied sciences and engineering education
  • +High-quality graduates well-prepared for careers
  • +Specialized focus on telecommunications, microwave, and RF engineering
  • +High quality education and focused, dedicated faculty
  • +Supportive and engaging learning atmosphere
  • +Promising infrastructure despite some limitations

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible online lectures and self-paced learning
  • +Affordability and recognized accreditation
  • +Online program and remote learning access
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is problematic.
  • -Unresponsive or unhelpful administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are commonly disliked.
  • -Teaching quality and course structure are often criticized.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Overcrowding and limited access to essential services cause considerable dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates significant strengths in its **Facilities**, which received a perfect score, and its **Location** and **Value**, both rated highly. The university also received a solid 4.33 for its **Professors**. Its **Accommodations** are a weaker area, scoring 3.67, while **Student Life** and **Internationality** received satisfactory marks at 4.

Nothing to show

This institution exhibits a strong standing, particularly in its **Location** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Conversely, **Student Life** is rated as the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in that domain. Other aspects like Facilities, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate range.

This institution shines brightest in **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accommodation** are also strong points, earning solid 4s. However, **Location** is a significant weakness, with a score of 0, and **Value** sits at a moderate 3, indicating areas for improvement.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, achieving a perfect score, and also excels in **Internationality** and **Value**, both rated at 4.5. Areas of solid performance include **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Location**, all scoring 4.25. The lowest-rated aspect is **Accomodation**, with a score of 3.5, indicating room for improvement in this category.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its facilities, receiving a perfect score. Location is another strong point, rated highly at 4.67. Student life, however, is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Accommodations and value for money are also well-regarded, both at 4.33. Ratings for professors and internationality are moderate, around 3.67.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5 stars. Students highlight great teachers, strong industry connections, and a blend of theory and practice, particularly in computer science and multimedia.

Nothing to show

With a 4.17 average rating from 6 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~83%). Students praise academic programs, faculty, modern facilities, and growth opportunities. A few mentioned slightly outdated instruments or large class sizes.

With a single review, this university has a 4/5 average rating. The sole feedback was positive, highlighting a prestigious education and rigorous assessment that prepares graduates well for careers.

All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the high standard of education, quality training, and dedicated faculty. Minor infrastructure concerns, like a shortage of lecture halls, were noted.

Nothing to show

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students praise flexibility in scheduling, affordability, and the convenience of online lectures. Some mention a desire for fully remote exams.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
50%
100%
50%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close