INSEAD Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 216 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality faculty and relevant curriculum
- +Diverse and international peer community
- +Practical learning and career opportunities
- +High-quality, practical teaching from experienced professors
- +Strong industry connections and career support
- +Valuable alumni network and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Practical curriculum and quality teaching
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Career preparation and alumni network
- +High-quality, practical education with flexible pathways
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous activities and events
- +Supportive and international learning environment
- +Strong global network and personal growth
- +Practical industry experience and diverse opportunities
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of effective communication and support leaves students feeling ignored.
- -Steep tuition fees strain financial investment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical application
- -Unprofessional training and limited career support relative to cost
- -Mismatch between program offerings and student expectations
- -Poorly prepared and unhelpful professors.
- -Disorganized and irrelevant course content.
- -High cost for low value.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing students for the future.
With exceptional scores, this institution excels in its professorial staff, earning a near-perfect 4.7. Accommodation and value are also highly rated, both exceeding 4.5. The university demonstrates strong international appeal and impressive facilities, each scoring 4.4. Student life is solid at 4.0. The location, however, is the lowest-rated aspect at 3.7.
An analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive reception across key aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest score. Conversely, accommodation was rated lowest among the surveyed categories. Facilities, professors, student life, and value all received solid marks, indicating a well-rounded student experience with areas for potential improvement.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.25. **Location** also receives a strong endorsement. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.57. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a respectable mid-range, generally hovering around the 4.0 mark.
Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across various aspects. Its strongest areas are **Location** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.18), suggesting these are significant advantages. **Accomodation** (3.48) received the lowest score, indicating potential room for improvement in this category. Other ratings for Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value are all above 3.8, indicating generally positive feedback.
Exhibiting particularly strong performance, the university achieved its highest rating in Internationality, followed closely by Facilities and Student Life. Conversely, Location received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Other well-regarded areas include Accomodation, Value, and Professors, all scoring well above average.
With a ~86% positive rating from 7 reviews, students highlight atmosphere, challenging programs, and learning new business skills. Some mention a packed curriculum and dislike of program location.
~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, and strong corporate/alumni networks for career development. One review expressed concerns about high tuition fees relative to investment.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
~89% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical curriculum, good teaching, and international environments. A small minority (~5%) found courses superficial or lacking practical value.
With a 3.96 average rating from 23 reviews, ~82% highlight the school's high-quality education, diverse academic pathways, and vibrant campus life. A small portion (~9%) reported unprepared professors and organizational issues.
With an average rating of 4.77/5 from 57 reviews, ~95% highlight positive experiences. Recurring themes include skill development and valuable internships. No negative feedback was reported.
like the atmosphere. Challenging program. Dislike the location of the program, too far away from city. The curriculum is very packed and the peers are very nice. Enjoying the program so far and defintely learning new business skills.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.
