Sumy State University vs Cyprus International Institute of Management vs Elon University vs SRH Northrhine Westphalia vs Business Management School - BMS

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Business Management School - BMS (5.00)
Sumy State University: wins 0/5 categories
Cyprus International Institute of Management: wins 0/5 categories
Elon University: wins 2/5 categories
SRH Northrhine Westphalia: wins 0/5 categories
Business Management School - BMS: wins 3/5 categories
University of Batna 2: wins 0/5 categories
Chowmuhani Government Saleh Ahmed College: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine
Elon, North Carolina, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Biomedical Science
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.75
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.25
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.25
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.50
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Understanding and supportive teachers
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledge acquisition
  • +Positive campus environment and affordability

Nothing to show

  • +Strong sense of community and support
  • +Quality academic programs and resources
  • +Positive social and campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on experience.
  • +Strong reputation in business management and biomedical sciences.
  • +UK transfer options.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Insufficient practical training and overwhelming theory.
  • -Irrelevant or excessive coursework, including unnecessary national language and history.
  • -Poor communication, administrative issues, and perceived financial exploitation.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management systems cause frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Considering a university's strengths and weaknesses, location stands out as a particularly strong aspect, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with a significantly lower score. Other aspects such as facilities, professors, student life, and internationality fall within a moderate range, indicating a balanced performance across these categories.

Nothing to show

Exceptional strengths are evident in the university's professors and student life, both receiving perfect scores. Value for money also stands out with a top rating. The weakest area, though still strong, is the facilities at 4 out of 5. Location, accommodation, and internationality are all rated highly at 4.5, indicating a well-rounded and appealing educational environment.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a perfect score. Accommodations present a notable area for improvement, rated at a 3, while Value is also strong at 4. Overall, the university excels in student experience and academic offerings, with accommodations being the primary point of consideration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~67% of reviews are positive, praising understanding teachers and good learning experiences. ~33% are negative, citing insufficient practical training and irrelevant coursework.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews highlight strong community support and positive learning experiences. Students praise enjoyable events and qualified professors. A desire for increased diversity and cultural representation among staff was noted.

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly favorable. Students specifically praise hands-on experience and strong programs in business management and biomedical sciences. Transfer options to the UK are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
33%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close