Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs Sheikh Hasina University vs Thomas Edison State University vs Uttarakhand Open University

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Maulana Azad National Urdu University (5.00)
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman: wins 0/4 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/4 categories
Sheikh Hasina University: wins 0/4 categories
Thomas Edison State University: wins 1/4 categories
Uttarakhand Open University: wins 0/4 categories
Maulana Azad National Urdu University: wins 3/4 categories
Netrokona University: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Netrokona, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Trenton, New Jersey, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Liberal Arts
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Netrokona, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
3.25
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.75
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
3.25
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.50
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.50
2.75
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
2.50
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
  • +Positive student atmosphere and community.
  • +Opportunities for practical experience and international exchange.
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible online courses and credit transfer
  • +Supportive faculty, staff, and advisors
  • +Comprehensive and challenging curriculum

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive learning environment and experienced faculty
  • +Practical learning and skill development
  • +Strong career foundation

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Pervasive corruption and a focus on extracting money.
  • -Inadequate and unengaging teaching from unmotivated lecturers.
  • -Wasted time with little real value gained.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative burdens and poor management create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support negatively impacts the student experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. **Location** and **Professors** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

This institution garners top marks for its excellent facilities, prime location, and accommodation. Professor quality and international appeal are also well-regarded. Conversely, student life received a notably low score, indicating a significant area for improvement in social engagement and campus activities.

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were awarded across most aspects of this institution. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all received perfect scores, indicating outstanding performance in these key areas. Accommodation presented a slight dip, scoring a 4 out of 5, representing the only area not achieving full marks. Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths and offers excellent value.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.25/5, feedback is split evenly between positive and negative. Students praised good staff and interesting programs, while others cited corruption and unengaging teaching.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, feedback for Thomas Edison State University is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the flexible, comprehensive curriculum, helpful advisors, and credit transfer policies.

Nothing to show

The sole review is highly positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment, experienced faculty, and practical learning opportunities. This feedback indicates a strong focus on skill development and career preparation, with ~100% of sentiment being positive.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
50%
0%
50%
0%
100%
0%
4★
25%
25%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close