Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman vs Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law vs National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy vs National Technical University of Ukraine Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute - NTUU KPI vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM
Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
- +Positive student atmosphere and community.
- +Opportunities for practical experience and international exchange.
Nothing to show
- +High academic standards and international focus
- +Opportunities for practical learning and creativity
- +Strong reputation and European standards
- +Strong technical foundation and useful experience
- +Cool community and interesting social life
- +Intense but manageable workload
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
- +Strong business and language programmes
- +Effective learning and task completion
- +Positive learning experience
- +Strong campus atmosphere and good friendships
- +Nice and approachable teachers
- -Pervasive corruption and a focus on extracting money.
- -Inadequate and unengaging teaching from unmotivated lecturers.
- -Wasted time with little real value gained.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful support staff are a recurring complaint.
- -Administrative and management indifference to student well-being.
- -Outdated facilities and ongoing maintenance problems.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frustrating.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from staff is a major concern.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. **Location** and **Professors** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.
Nothing to show
This institution excels particularly in areas like Student Life (4.6), Location (4.5), and Facilities (4.3), indicating a vibrant and well-situated campus environment. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas, Value stands out with a perfect 5, suggesting a strong return on investment. Professor ratings are a moderate 3.7.
Analysis of this university's ratings reveals strengths in its **Location (4.5)**, standing out significantly. Conversely, the weakest areas appear to be **Professors (2)** and **Accomodation (2.5)**, both receiving considerably lower scores. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately at 3, while Internationality and Value fall within the lower-average range.
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
Regarding university performance, the location received a perfect score, standing out as its strongest attribute. Conversely, accommodation was rated the lowest. Professors, student life, internationality, and value all garnered solid ratings, reflecting well on these aspects. Facilities also received a respectable, though mid-range, score.
Consistently scoring a perfect 5 across all metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated outstandingly. There are no discernible weak areas, as the university achieves top marks uniformly. This indicates a uniformly excellent and well-rounded educational experience.
With an average rating of 3.25/5, feedback is split evenly between positive and negative. Students praised good staff and interesting programs, while others cited corruption and unengaging teaching.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise educational quality, practical lessons, encouraged critical thinking, and opportunities for creativity.
With an average rating of 3.33/5, approximately 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting a cool community, useful experience, and strong technical foundation. Some negative feedback (33.3%) mentions areas for improvement such as building repairs and heating issues.
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
Two out of three reviews are positive, contributing to an average rating of 4/5. Students praise the learning experience and curriculum, with minimal negative feedback.
The single review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. The student enjoyed the atmosphere and appreciated the nice teachers, strongly recommending it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show