Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman vs Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University vs National Aviation University vs Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM
Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
- +Positive student atmosphere and community.
- +Opportunities for practical experience and international exchange.
Nothing to show
- +Excellent faculty and engaging teaching methods
- +Valuable practical experience and career preparation
- +Supportive learning environment and strong community
Nothing to show
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
Nothing to show
- +Expert instructors and engaging teaching methods.
- +Relevant and practical curriculum with up-to-date content.
- +Supportive learning environment and strong career services.
- -Pervasive corruption and a focus on extracting money.
- -Inadequate and unengaging teaching from unmotivated lecturers.
- -Wasted time with little real value gained.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor English proficiency among professors.
Nothing to show
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
Nothing to show
- -Excessive workload and focus on written assignments over practical skills.
- -Ineffective and demanding remote learning practices.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. **Location** and **Professors** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.
Nothing to show
This institution's ratings present a mixed picture. Its strongest points are location, earning a respectable 3, suggesting good accessibility and surroundings. However, areas such as accommodation, professors, facilities, student life, and internationality all received a 2, indicating a need for significant improvement in these crucial aspects of the student experience. The value also received a 2, reflecting concerns about the return on investment.
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a strong showing in its location, which received the highest rating. Conversely, its facilities are the weakest point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Student life and value also received favorable marks, while professors, accommodation, and internationality fall in the middle range.
With an average rating of 3.25/5, feedback is split evenly between positive and negative. Students praised good staff and interesting programs, while others cited corruption and unengaging teaching.
Nothing to show
The single review indicates a highly negative experience. The reviewer cited old equipment not meeting program needs and professors with poor English proficiency, even in an English-taught program. This represented ~100% of feedback, resulting in a 1/5 average rating.
Nothing to show
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 2/5, two out of three reviews are negative (~67%). Students report excessive assignments and a focus on online tasks over practical learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
A certain hierarchy reigns in the university in which professors and the dean’s office are considered gods, and students and laboratory assistants are secondary characters. Despite this, there are people that ready to teach and help you I consider the opportunity to become more independent as a plus in NMU. Many faculties and campuses can also be attributed to the merits of university. The complexity of learning unites students so that you can turn a blind eye to shortcomings…