National Pedagogical Dragomanov University vs Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman vs Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM vs Kyiv National Linguistic University

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National Pedagogical Dragomanov University (5.00)
National Pedagogical Dragomanov University: wins 0/5 categories
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman: wins 0/5 categories
Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law: wins 0/5 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 4/5 categories
Kyiv National Linguistic University: wins 0/5 categories
GoIT Neoversity: wins 0/5 categories
Kyiv Medical University - KMU: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Kiev, Ukraine
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.33
Not rated
4.50
Location
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
3.67
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.67
4.67
Not rated
4.50
Student life
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Value
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.67
Not rated
4.50
Accommodation
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
4.67
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Positive atmosphere and friendly teachers
  • +Beautiful and quiet campus
  • +Supportive and manageable academic environment
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
  • +Positive student atmosphere and community.
  • +Opportunities for practical experience and international exchange.

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation
  • +Strong business and language programmes
  • +Effective learning and task completion
  • +Positive learning experience

Nothing to show

  • +Affordable quality education
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical, well-structured curriculum
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Pervasive corruption and a focus on extracting money.
  • -Inadequate and unengaging teaching from unmotivated lecturers.
  • -Wasted time with little real value gained.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frustrating.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support create a negative experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support creates frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication regarding policies and opportunities is common.
Rating summary
What students say

This university exhibits a uniformly unimpressive profile, with zero ratings across all evaluated aspects. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as either strong or weak. The institution scores equally low in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value, suggesting a pervasive need for improvement in all these domains.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. **Location** and **Professors** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.

Nothing to show

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Regarding university performance, the location received a perfect score, standing out as its strongest attribute. Conversely, accommodation was rated the lowest. Professors, student life, internationality, and value all garnered solid ratings, reflecting well on these aspects. Facilities also received a respectable, though mid-range, score.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional ratings across most categories, with perfect scores awarded for both **Location** and **Accomodation**. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also received outstanding marks. The **Professors** area, while still strong, is the relatively weakest point at a solid 4 out of 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is described as beautiful, quiet, and having a fine atmosphere. Students found exams easy, teachers lighthearted, and facilities bright.

With an average rating of 3.25/5, feedback is split evenly between positive and negative. Students praised good staff and interesting programs, while others cited corruption and unengaging teaching.

Nothing to show

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Two out of three reviews are positive, contributing to an average rating of 4/5. Students praise the learning experience and curriculum, with minimal negative feedback.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Reviews highlight affordable education and a solid curriculum with a good balance of theory and practical experience. Faculty are described as knowledgeable and supportive.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
25%
0%
67%
33%
0%
50%
4★
0%
25%
0%
33%
33%
0%
50%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Strong Foundation for Future Healthcare Careers

Kyiv Medical University offers a solid educational foundation for aspiring healthcare professionals. The faculty is knowledgeable and supportive, providing valuable insights and guidance throughout the program. The curriculum is well-structured, combining theoretical knowledge with practical experience, which is essential for our future careers. Opinion: Overall, my experience at Kyiv Medical University has been positive. I appreciate the emphasis on hands-on training and the opportunities to interact with patients early in our studies. The campus environment is vibrant and fosters a sense of community among students. However, I feel that there could be improvements in certain administrative processes, which can sometimes be slow and cumbersome. Recommendation: I would recommend Kyiv Medical University to those looking to pursue a medical career, as it equips students with the necessary skills and knowledge. The supportive atmosphere and strong academic foundation make it a worthwhile choice for anyone passionate about healthcare.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close