University of Manila - UDM vs University of the East vs Technological University of the Philippines - TUP vs STI Colleges vs Philippine Normal University - PNU
Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
- +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
- +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
- +Hands-on teaching and skilled, approachable professors
- +Quality education and career growth support
- +Real-world application and lively campus environment
- +Quality education and knowledgeable instructors
- +Free tuition and state university benefits
- +Personal development and practical skill application
- +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
- +Innovative teaching methodologies and future-ready educator focus
- +Strong curriculum and expert professors in education
- +Development of well-rounded, 21st-century teachers
Nothing to show
- -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
- -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
- -Minimal competitive program activities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency create uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff causes dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
Nothing to show
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.
With excellent marks in several key areas, this institution shines particularly bright in **Location** (4.4) and **Professors** (4.3), alongside a strong **Value** (4.3) score. Student life also garners positive feedback at 4.1. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are **Facilities** (3.7) and **Internationality** (3.8). **Accomodation**, at 3.56, is also an area that received the lowest rating.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its vibrant Student Life and outstanding Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors are also highly rated at 4.33, with Location following closely at 4.00. Areas for potential improvement include Internationality, receiving a rating of 3.33, and Facilities and Accommodation, both scoring 3.67.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.
This institution shines particularly bright in **professors** and **value**, both receiving perfect scores, and boasts excellent marks for **location**, **student life**, and **internationality**. Its **accommodation** also scores well. The sole area for potential improvement lies in its **facilities**, which received a rating of 3.
Nothing to show
Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.
With an average rating of 4.1/5, approximately 80% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable professors, quality education, and hands-on learning. A small percentage of feedback mentions inconsistent P.E. professors and weak Wi-Fi.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of student feedback is positive. Reviewers highlight good learning experiences, kind and approachable teachers, and quality education. A few mentions of facility deficiencies were noted.
All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight the university's effectiveness in developing well-rounded, future-ready educators with innovative approaches and excellent faculty expertise.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I liked how my program took really good care of my fellow students. I would like to change a few things, but they would include technology upgrades and change of faculty. For the university, I would like the administration to listen to their students, for it is their source of profit.
First off, since it is a state university the tuition is free, and students are not paying anything. However, because it is a public university I sometimes notice deficiencies in its facility. But aside from that, I can't say anything else that is bad about it. Quality education overall.
In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show