University of Manila - UDM vs National University - NU vs FEU Institute of Technology - FEU vs STI Colleges vs De La Salle Lipa - DLSL

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Manila - UDM: wins 0/0 categories
National University - NU: wins 0/0 categories
FEU Institute of Technology - FEU: wins 0/0 categories
STI Colleges: wins 0/0 categories
De La Salle Lipa - DLSL: wins 0/0 categories
Lyceum of the Philippines University Manila - LPU: wins 0/0 categories
San Beda University - SBU: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Application
Manila, Philippines
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Information Technology
Alaminos, Philippines
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Manila, Philippines
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Bsc Hospitality and Tourism Management
Manila, Philippines
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
2.50
3.33
5.00
4.20
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
2.00
4.00
3.00
4.60
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
3.67
3.00
4.80
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
2.50
3.67
3.00
4.60
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Student life
2.50
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
3.50
4.33
4.00
4.60
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
2.67
3.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
  • +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
  • +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
  • +High-quality education and supportive professors
  • +Financial aid options and focus on student well-being
  • +Academic and extracurricular support
  • +High-quality facilities and competent faculty
  • +Effective education and proper guidance
  • +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
  • +Supportive and inclusive community
  • +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
  • +Excellent nursing exam performance and faculty expertise
  • +Innovative and effective teaching methods
  • +Comprehensive learning resources
  • +Excellent support for personal growth and future career development.
  • +Valued guidance and mentorship from staff and professors.
  • +Opportunities for global success and advancement.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
  • -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
  • -Minimal competitive program activities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness are common complaints.
  • -Administrative & management issues are consistently problematic.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Limited opportunities for practical application and skill development are appreciated the least.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.

This university presents a mixed but generally positive picture. It excels in **Value**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores very well for **Location** and **Student Life**. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as its weakest area. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** are solid, while **Facilities** fall in the middle range.

The university excels in its **facilities**, receiving a perfect score. Areas like **professors**, **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are rated moderately at a 3, indicating room for improvement. **Student life** and **value** both received positive scores of 4, suggesting these are strong points for prospective students.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.

Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding performance. It achieved a perfect score of 5 in every category: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no identified weakest areas, as excellence is consistent throughout.

Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieved perfect scores in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students, with no discernible weak areas to report.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight quality education, supportive professors, and available scholarships. A minor point (~33%) noted issues with student accommodation during enrollment.

The single review is positive, giving a 4/5 rating. It highlights high-quality facilities and competent faculty for computer studies and engineering. Negative feedback is absent.

All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.

With a 5/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong faculty teaching and effective resources, particularly mentioning the nursing licensure exam performance.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students report high satisfaction, highlighting the university's role in personal growth and career development.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
33%
0%
40%
100%
100%
0%
4★
67%
33%
100%
60%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A good example

In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close