University of Manila - UDM vs Centro Escolar University - CEU vs Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP vs STI Colleges vs Colegio de San Juan de Letran - CSJL

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Manila - UDM: wins 0/5 categories
Centro Escolar University - CEU: wins 0/5 categories
Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP: wins 0/5 categories
STI Colleges: wins 0/5 categories
Colegio de San Juan de Letran - CSJL: wins 0/5 categories
Adamson University - ADU: wins 0/5 categories
Lyceum of the Philippines University Manila - LPU: wins 5/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Application
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Alaminos, Philippines
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration (American Degree)
Manila, Philippines
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Best programme: Bsc Hospitality and Tourism Management
Category ratings
Facilities
2.50
4.20
4.00
4.20
5.00
4.00
5.00
Location
2.00
4.60
3.56
4.60
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Professors
4.00
4.20
3.89
4.80
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.50
4.20
3.33
4.60
3.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Student life
2.50
4.40
3.67
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Value
3.50
4.60
4.22
4.60
4.50
4.50
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.00
4.60
3.56
4.00
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
  • +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
  • +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and approachable faculty
  • +Opportunities for skill development and extracurriculars
  • +Well-equipped facilities for science and practical learning
  • +Strong engineering and architecture programs
  • +Good facilities and adaptive online learning
  • +Caring instructors and useful practical application
  • +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
  • +Supportive and inclusive community
  • +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programs
  • +High-end facilities and professional personnel
  • +Extracurricular activities and scholarships
  • +Strong academic programs and successful alumni
  • +Positive and supportive campus community
  • +Valued personal attributes like work ethic and values
  • +Excellent support for personal growth and future career development.
  • +Valued guidance and mentorship from staff and professors.
  • +Opportunities for global success and advancement.
Cons
  • -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
  • -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
  • -Minimal competitive program activities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Overcrowding and large class sizes reduce individual attention.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of practical application and unclear career relevance are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative & management issues are consistently problematic.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Limited opportunities for practical application and skill development are appreciated the least.
Rating summary
What students say

Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.

This institution garners exceptional ratings across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Accomodation**, both achieving a perfect 4.6. **Student Life** is also highly regarded at 4.4. The university demonstrates strong performance in **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**, each scoring 4.2. While all metrics are positive, the ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** represent the comparatively lower, though still good, scores within this otherwise excellent profile.

This institution receives positive marks in several key areas, with **Value** standing out as its strongest point at 4.22. **Facilities** also garnered a high rating of 4.0. On the other hand, **Internationality** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and student life. Accommodation and location also receive high marks. The university's strongest areas are its student experience and physical resources. Conversely, internationality is its lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a more diverse and global campus community. Overall, it presents a very positive picture with only one area falling below a 4.0 rating.

The university demonstrates particularly strong performance in student life, earning a perfect score. It also boasts excellent ratings for its professors and value for money. Facilities, location, accommodation, and internationality are all rated highly at a solid 4. While no areas received low marks, these latter categories represent the relative weakest points, though still indicating a positive experience.

Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieved perfect scores in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students, with no discernible weak areas to report.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Recurring themes include a welcoming atmosphere, approachable and effective professors, and well-equipped facilities.

With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong engineering programs and good facilities. A minority of reviews found the location crowded and some instructors less engaged.

All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.

With an average rating of 5/5, university reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight supportive faculty, excellent facilities, and a broad range of academic programs. Extra-curricular activities and scholarships are also appreciated.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the university's successful graduates and strong academic programs, particularly in engineering. The campus atmosphere is described as clean, peaceful, and community-oriented.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students report high satisfaction, highlighting the university's role in personal growth and career development.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
80%
67%
40%
100%
50%
100%
4★
67%
20%
22%
60%
0%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A good example

In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close