University of Manila - UDM vs De La Salle - College of Saint Benilde - DSL-CSB vs Far Eastern University vs STI Colleges vs The National Teacher's College - NTC
Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
- +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
- +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
- +Vibrant and inclusive community
- +Exposure to diverse perspectives
- +Distinctive and specialized courses
- +Welcoming and diverse community
- +Supportive and professional faculty
- +Inspiring and refreshing campus environment
- +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
- +High quality, world-class education at an affordable rate.
- +Flexible online learning options with approachable professors.
- +Supportive and inclusive environment with a concentrated study approach.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
- -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
- -Minimal competitive program activities.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods bore students.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engagement from instructors are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are evident.
- -Inconsistent enforcement of rules and staff behavior are frustrating.
Nothing to show
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.
This institution garners outstanding scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation. Student Life and Internationality are also well-regarded, receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Location is the sole category not reaching the highest tier, though it still scores favorably at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, particularly excelling in its academic and infrastructural provisions.
The university shines brightest in student life, achieving a remarkable 4.73 rating. Location and value are also highly regarded at 4.5 and 4.58 respectively. On the other hand, internationality received the lowest score at 4.0, indicating room for improvement in this area. Facilities, professors, and accommodation all received solid marks between 4.4 and 4.45.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring a perfect 4 out of 5. **Student Life** and **Location** also received solid marks at 3.8. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.2, and **Internationality** at 3.4, suggesting opportunities to enhance these aspects of the university experience.
Nothing to show
Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.
With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly praised for its vibrant, inclusive community and diverse student body. Students appreciate the enrichment gained from varied perspectives and endorse the institution for specialized, unconventional courses fostering personal growth.
With a 4.33 average rating from 12 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight a welcoming and diverse community, expert faculty, and excellent facilities. Some students noted a lack of program-specific exploration, particularly in fieldwork.
All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.
With ~80% positive feedback, students praise high-quality, affordable education, supportive faculty, and flexible learning. A smaller ~20% of reviews express concerns about administrative processes and event prioritization over student learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show