University of Manila - UDM vs De La Salle - College of Saint Benilde - DSL-CSB vs Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP vs University of the East vs STI Colleges
Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
- +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
- +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
- +Vibrant and inclusive community
- +Exposure to diverse perspectives
- +Distinctive and specialized courses
- +Strong engineering and architecture programs
- +Good facilities and adaptive online learning
- +Caring instructors and useful practical application
- +Hands-on teaching and skilled, approachable professors
- +Quality education and career growth support
- +Real-world application and lively campus environment
- +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
- +Health and science focus
- +Practical communication skills
Nothing to show
- -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
- -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
- -Minimal competitive program activities.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods bore students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency create uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Communication and feedback from instructors are often lacking or poor.
Nothing to show
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.
This institution garners outstanding scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation. Student Life and Internationality are also well-regarded, receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Location is the sole category not reaching the highest tier, though it still scores favorably at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, particularly excelling in its academic and infrastructural provisions.
This institution receives positive marks in several key areas, with **Value** standing out as its strongest point at 4.22. **Facilities** also garnered a high rating of 4.0. On the other hand, **Internationality** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.
With excellent marks in several key areas, this institution shines particularly bright in **Location** (4.4) and **Professors** (4.3), alongside a strong **Value** (4.3) score. Student life also garners positive feedback at 4.1. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are **Facilities** (3.7) and **Internationality** (3.8). **Accomodation**, at 3.56, is also an area that received the lowest rating.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.
Across the board, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating excellence in every surveyed area. Particularly outstanding are its facilities and professors, both receiving top marks. While no weak areas are identified, the consistent five-star ratings suggest a remarkably well-rounded and highly desirable university experience across all aspects of student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.
Nothing to show
Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.
With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly praised for its vibrant, inclusive community and diverse student body. Students appreciate the enrichment gained from varied perspectives and endorse the institution for specialized, unconventional courses fostering personal growth.
With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong engineering programs and good facilities. A minority of reviews found the location crowded and some instructors less engaged.
With an average rating of 4.1/5, approximately 80% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable professors, quality education, and hands-on learning. A small percentage of feedback mentions inconsistent P.E. professors and weak Wi-Fi.
All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.
The single review for the university is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests ~100% satisfaction, with commendations for its focus on health and sciences, and valuable learning in behavioral science.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I liked how my program took really good care of my fellow students. I would like to change a few things, but they would include technology upgrades and change of faculty. For the university, I would like the administration to listen to their students, for it is their source of profit.
In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show