University of Santo Tomas Manila - UST vs Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP vs FEU Institute of Technology - FEU vs Mapua University - MU vs STI Colleges

Side-by-side comparison from 55 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: De La Salle Lipa - DLSL (5.00)
University of Santo Tomas Manila - UST: wins 0/5 categories
Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP: wins 0/5 categories
FEU Institute of Technology - FEU: wins 0/5 categories
Mapua University - MU: wins 0/5 categories
STI Colleges: wins 0/5 categories
De La Salle Lipa - DLSL: wins 5/5 categories
The National Teacher's College - NTC: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Information Technology
Manila, Philippines
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Architecture
Alaminos, Philippines
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Manila, Philippines
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Secondary Education
Category ratings
Facilities
4.11
4.00
5.00
3.67
4.20
5.00
3.60
Location
4.22
3.56
3.00
4.00
4.60
5.00
Win
3.80
Professors
4.32
3.89
3.00
4.25
4.80
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
4.29
3.33
3.00
3.75
4.60
5.00
Win
3.40
Student life
4.50
3.67
4.00
3.33
5.00
5.00
3.80
Value
4.32
4.22
4.00
4.50
4.60
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.93
3.56
3.00
3.67
4.00
5.00
Win
3.20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and updated curriculum
  • +Beautiful and expansive campus with vibrant community
  • +Emphasis on tradition and faith
  • +Strong engineering and architecture programs
  • +Good facilities and adaptive online learning
  • +Caring instructors and useful practical application
  • +High-quality facilities and competent faculty
  • +Effective education and proper guidance
  • +Strong engineering and computer science programs
  • +Excellent professors in major subjects
  • +Effective online learning platform
  • +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
  • +Supportive and inclusive community
  • +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
  • +Excellent nursing exam performance and faculty expertise
  • +Innovative and effective teaching methods
  • +Comprehensive learning resources
  • +High quality, world-class education at an affordable rate.
  • +Flexible online learning options with approachable professors.
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with a concentrated study approach.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
  • -administrative & management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of communication and transparency
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are evident.
  • -Inconsistent enforcement of rules and staff behavior are frustrating.
Rating summary
What students say

This university scores well across most surveyed areas, with student life emerging as its strongest aspect. Professors and value also received high marks, reflecting positively on the academic experience and return on investment. Accommodation presents the lowest-rated category, suggesting potential areas for improvement. Location and internationality are also considered strengths, contributing to a well-rounded university experience.

This institution receives positive marks in several key areas, with **Value** standing out as its strongest point at 4.22. **Facilities** also garnered a high rating of 4.0. On the other hand, **Internationality** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.

The university excels in its **facilities**, receiving a perfect score. Areas like **professors**, **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are rated moderately at a 3, indicating room for improvement. **Student life** and **value** both received positive scores of 4, suggesting these are strong points for prospective students.

Overall, this university garners strong praise, particularly for its **value**, which received the highest rating. Professors are also highly regarded, reflecting a positive academic environment. Areas with slightly lower, yet still solid, scores include facilities, accommodation, and internationality. The weakest performing category appears to be student life, indicating room for potential improvement in that aspect of the student experience.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.

Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding performance. It achieved a perfect score of 5 in every category: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no identified weakest areas, as excellence is consistent throughout.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring a perfect 4 out of 5. **Student Life** and **Location** also received solid marks at 3.8. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.2, and **Internationality** at 3.4, suggesting opportunities to enhance these aspects of the university experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.53/5, ~90%+ of reviews are positive, highlighting a beautiful campus, strong academic programs (medicine, education, arts, nursing, pharmacy), and supportive faculty. A few mention minor administrative improvements needed.

With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong engineering programs and good facilities. A minority of reviews found the location crowded and some instructors less engaged.

The single review is positive, giving a 4/5 rating. It highlights high-quality facilities and competent faculty for computer studies and engineering. Negative feedback is absent.

With 100% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.25/5, students highlight the university's strong engineering reputation and effective online learning platform. Some mention the hard work required to succeed academically.

All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.

With a 5/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong faculty teaching and effective resources, particularly mentioning the nursing licensure exam performance.

With ~80% positive feedback, students praise high-quality, affordable education, supportive faculty, and flexible learning. A smaller ~20% of reviews express concerns about administrative processes and event prioritization over student learning.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
67%
0%
25%
40%
100%
20%
4★
20%
22%
100%
75%
60%
0%
60%
3★
13%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
Most useful review
Most liked
Go Thomasian Tigers!

This is the main factor that pushed me to choose UST-FMS in the end. When you look at the number of passers vs. the non-passers for the boards, you’ll see that UST produces the most number of doctors (among the well-known schools). This fact continues to amaze me because it shows that UST-FMS is capable of turning an ordinary person to someone extraordinary after four years of training. Con # 1: Major adjustment for non-UST graduates. If you’re a social butterfly, then this wouldn’t be a con for you at all. But if you’re a bit socially-challenged like me, I think that one of the biggest obstacles in med school is finding friends. It takes effort and time especially if you’re surrounded by people who’ve known each other from undergrad. Being one out of the four UPCN students that enrolled in UST, it wasn’t very easy for me to adjust. Good thing I ended up in the same subsection with one of my former batchmates, which made the matter of making new friends less pressing. But do not let this can hinder you! In time, I was able to adjust and make new friends (thank God!). Pro # 2: Excellent Faculty. Majority of the faculty members really “do their thing”. Meaning, most of them are really good at what they teach. Though there are a few here and there, who left me unimpressed. Nonetheless, I can assure you that most of our lectures, lab sessions, and SGDs, are handled well; and you will really learn a lot especially from the really intellectual teachers. Most of the faculty members and staff are approachable, too! Matters can be brought out into the open and inquiries are entertained. One thing I really appreciated about the departments is that they promptly posted the answer key after each and every quiz/exam. What’s more is that when you disagree about a certain answer, you can approach the departments with a letter for clarification, and if you are able to provide evidence (usually from the reference textbooks) then they will change/ consider the answer. My favorite so far is our faculty for physiology because they really handle the subject well. Almost all the concepts are more or less retained because they have this course structure that encourages repetition for reinforcement. For instance, for one topic, we have one short quiz, one figure-review quiz, a lab session (depending on the topic), a long exam, and a shifting exam. Con # 2: Some Treat Us Like Children. We have this “attitude” component in our grade, which is more or less used to elicit good behavior. We get penalized for being absent (unexcused), for leaving the room dirty, and stuff like that. While I recognize that this comes with good intent from the faculty, I hate being treated like a child. The use of external reinforcement (grades) is too elementary for me. Aren’t we old enough to be trusted to have the maturity and innate drive to do the right things? Nonetheless, you’ll be surprised to see that even if you are already in grad school, some people just really don’t mature enough. There are students who still tend to be noisy during class, be ruthless and inconsiderate… you get the point. I just take refuge in this fact that some people really need this “attitude” thing to behave well. Pro # 3: Good Facilities. The first thing that struck me during my first week in med school was that each and every room in UST-FMS had projectors and Mac computers for the lectures! I can assure you that the state of the facilities in the school somehow compensates for the BIG tuition fee. As an example, let me point out that we have a Medical Informatics Center where you can do research work using TOUCH SCREEN computers! Like other schools, we also have a library, auditoriums, a classroom, some chairs… you get the point. We also have access to the other facilities of the whole university. And just to add, we have a good “outside” environment too!! Nothing beats walking along lover’s lane, breathing (somewhat) fresh air, and basking in that university feel. If there’s one complaint I have about our building, it’s that the med cafe is too small for the student population and the food is too expensive!!! But this is saved by the fact that Dapitan (the haven of cheap street food and canteens) is just a few steps away from UST. With only 40 or so pesos, you have a hearty meal of sisig/buttered chicken/adobo/name-it-you-got-it. Haha. You just really need to look for the “safe” carinderias which serve clean food. Con # 3: Student Population. Our batch is composed of 500+ individuals which is a tad bit too many for me. Although the classrooms are able to accommodate us all, I think that 100+ students under one wing are too much. There are a select-few classrooms that I find “unconducive” for learning, because of its size and layout. But generally, it’s A-Ok. It just sometimes bothers me that we are so many. I think that our batch, in particular, went a little over the limit of the number of students allowed. Not sure, though. So I guess if you learn well in a small class, and you find yourself unwilling/unable to adjust to a HUGE class, then UST isn’t the school for you. Pro and Con # 4: Pseudo-Traditional “Spoonfeeding” Curriculum. The general view about UST is that it has a traditional curriculum, focused more on the theoretical aspect with lectures and exams. This is mostly true because as compared to other med schools, we are really battered with consecutive quizzes and exams to evaluate our learning. But actually, it’s not wholly traditional! There is also a PBL aspect incorporated into the curriculum in the form of SGDs, lab conferences, and the SCOFYL (you’ll know what this is soon enough! And personally, I prefer this pseudo-traditional approach. I think that one needs to really understand the theories before applying them. The UST curriculum gives us that, as evidenced by the high board passing rate. I have heard that our graduates also do well in their clerkships/internships/ residencies. Another issue about the school’s curriculum is the spoon-feeding. I will not deny this. Coming from UP, I readily observed that UST definitely spoon-feeds in the sense that almost everything is prepared for us. Almost all departments are fond of giving hand-outs (which are very useful, if I may add). But really, other than this, you’re on your own. At the end of the day, it all boils down to how much a student is willing to take in and study. The only con I see with the curriculum is that it is somewhat conducive to the G.C. (aka grade conscious) culture. Which, in my opinion, shouldn’t be the case. Studying should be driven by learning and not solely by high grades. But that’s just me generalizing and being ideal. It all really depends on what kind of student you want to be! To be honest, I’m also guilty of being grade-hungry sometimes, but I really make a conscious effort not to. And because I’m sleeeeeeepy and out of ideas, I’ll just leave this post at this point and add to the list in the following days. I hope that this little guide helps you come up with the best decision! Just always remember that med school should fit you perfectly like a velvet glove. Go to a school that you know you will love, because when things got tough (academically), having a good school environment and school pride will be one of the major factors that will push you to finish med.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

UOx: Tech Education Redefined at Mapua University

From the vantage point of a Computer Science student, I find Mapua University's UOx (University Online) and Asynchronous Learning Platform to be a remarkable asset in augmenting my academic journey. This platform offers an array of sterling features, specifically designed to meet the demands of tech-savvy learners such as myself. My appraisal of this service is highly favorable, as elucidated below: Streamlined and Intuitive Interface: The Graphical User Interface (GUI) strikes a commendable balance between user-friendliness and sophistication, making it navigable even for those acquainted with intricate technical interfaces. The streamlined approach to various features - from submitting assignments to engaging in discourse on discussion threads - makes this platform an ease to navigate. Accessibility and Flexibility: Given the nature of a student's life, laden with multifarious commitments spanning studying and working, the asynchronous nature of UOx provides an excellent solution. The ability to view lecture recordings at my convenience, as well as access materials via cloud storage, eradicating device compatibility concerns, adds immense value to this platform. Superior Learning Tools: The platform's gamification feature is particularly noteworthy, encouraging user engagement through an award system. Moreover, integration with third-party applications, notably Moodle LMS, significantly broadens the scope of available learning resources. Robust Monitoring Dashboard: The platform integrates real-time analytics and reporting, simplifying the management of educational programs. Such insights afford educators an understanding of their course reach, looking into student engagement and usage statistics. This feature also assists administrators overseeing platform deployment across various campuses in tracking user behavior. Customizable Grading Systems: Recognizing the diverse evaluation preferences among educators, UOx allows the creation of tailored grading rubrics, aligning with individual teaching philosophies. This flexibility provides a fair and precise assessment, greatly benefiting the students. In conclusion, I am sincerely impressed with the functionality and foresight embedded within Mapua University's UOx and Asynchronous Learning Platform. The comprehensive range of its potent yet accessible features brilliantly caters to the unique demands of tech-oriented learners. As I anticipate further delving into its expansive benefits, this platform undoubtedly sets Mapua University as an appealing choice for aspiring Computer Science students seeking premium education in Southeast Asia.

A good example

In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close